Enabling the use of unstructured meshes for the large-eddy simulation of stable atmospheric boundary layers

Abstract. Modelling wind flows over complex terrain under varying atmospheric stability conditions is essential for improving our understanding of atmospheric boundary layer physics and its impact on wind energy systems. However, such simulations remain challenging due to the complexity of generating a mesh that matches complex geometries and the inherent difficulty of modelling the stable boundary layer, characterized by small-scale turbulent structures. To tackle this challenge, high-fidelity simulations with unstructured meshes, which offer great geometric flexibility, are used in this study. Nevertheless, unstructured grids are rarely used in atmospheric simulations. This study establishes a baseline framework for the use of unstructured meshes in atmospheric boundary layer simulations, with particular relevance to complex terrain. The proposed solver is validated against two well-established benchmarks under neutral and stable stratification. For the neutral case, the Andren benchmark, a 1.28×1.28×1.5 km3 periodic domain where the flow is driven by a large-scale pressure gradient, is considered. Results from structured and unstructured grids are in good agreement, with minor differences observed near the surface. Unstructured grids exhibit slightly higher friction velocities due to wall-proximal grid quality but remain within the expected variability of existing studies. The solver is then applied to the GABLS1 stable boundary layer case, a 400×400×400 m3 domain with surface cooling. Both grid types capture the evolution of the SBL, with unstructured grids yielding higher surface heat fluxes – up to 14 % – resulting in a thicker boundary layer and noticeable differences in mean profiles and fluxes. A mesh refinement study confirms that a horizontal resolution of Δx=6.25 m is sufficient for accurate SBL representation with both mesh types. Overall, the results demonstrate that unstructured meshes are a viable and robust tool for atmospheric boundary layer modelling, capable of matching the accuracy of structured grids while offering the flexibility required for complex terrain. The minor discrepancies observed remain within the variability expected from model formulation choices. This work thus provides a foundational reference for future high-fidelity atmospheric simulations using unstructured grids, particularly in terrain-resolving contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wind energy science
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-597-2026
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling the use of unstructured meshes for the large-eddy simulation of stable atmospheric boundary layers

Mostafa Safdari Shadloo, U. Vigny, Stéphanie Zeoli, Léa Voivenel et al.
Wind energy science
Wind and Air Flow Studies
article

Enabling the use of unstructured meshes for the large-eddy simulation of stable atmospheric boundary layers

Mostafa Safdari Shadloo, U. Vigny, Stéphanie Zeoli, Léa Voivenel, Pierre Bénard
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Modelling wind flows over complex terrain under varying atmospheric stability conditions is essential for improving our understanding of atmospheric boundary layer physics and its impact on wind energy systems. However, such simulations remain challenging due to the complexity of generating a mesh that matches complex geometries and the inherent difficulty of modelling the stable boundary layer, characterized by small-scale turbulent structures. To tackle this challenge, high-fidelity simulations with unstructured meshes, which offer great geometric flexibility, are used in this study. Nevertheless, unstructured grids are rarely used in atmospheric simulations. This study establishes a baseline framework for the use of unstructured meshes in atmospheric boundary layer simulations, with particular relevance to complex terrain. The proposed solver is validated against two well-established benchmarks under neutral and stable stratification. For the neutral case, the Andren benchmark, a 1.28×1.28×1.5 km3 periodic domain where the flow is driven by a large-scale pressure gradient, is considered. Results from structured and unstructured grids are in good agreement, with minor differences observed near the surface. Unstructured grids exhibit slightly higher friction velocities due to wall-proximal grid quality but remain within the expected variability of existing studies. The solver is then applied to the GABLS1 stable boundary layer case, a 400×400×400 m3 domain with surface cooling. Both grid types capture the evolution of the SBL, with unstructured grids yielding higher surface heat fluxes – up to 14 % – resulting in a thicker boundary layer and noticeable differences in mean profiles and fluxes. A mesh refinement study confirms that a horizontal resolution of Δx=6.25 m is sufficient for accurate SBL representation with both mesh types. Overall, the results demonstrate that unstructured meshes are a viable and robust tool for atmospheric boundary layer modelling, capable of matching the accuracy of structured grids while offering the flexibility required for complex terrain. The minor discrepancies observed remain within the variability expected from model formulation choices. This work thus provides a foundational reference for future high-fidelity atmospheric simulations using unstructured grids, particularly in terrain-resolving contexts.

Wind energy scienceVol. 11(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Mons (BE), Normandie Université (FR), Université de Rouen Normandie (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Rouen Normandie (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.