A Case-Study-Based Comparative Evaluation of Functional Analysis Paradigms in Aircraft System Design

Functional analysis plays a critical role in early-stage aircraft system design by defining system functions that guide downstream architectural development and verification. In practice, many design deficiencies originate not from incorrect physical realization but from incomplete or ambiguous functional definitions established at conceptual stages. This challenge is particularly pronounced in aircraft systems, where interaction- and physical-effect-induced functions tend to remain implicit and weakly justified. To address this issue, in this study, we conduct a case-study-based comparative evaluation of three functional analysis paradigms: design-theory-oriented functional decomposition, systems-engineering-based functional allocation, and scenario-driven functional analysis. Using an aircraft ground deceleration scenario as a controlled context, this comparison examines how different function-derivation mechanisms influence the identification and justification of interaction- and effect-induced functions. Through structured cross-paradigm comparison, three distinct and, in principle, reproducible derivation mechanisms, namely decomposition-driven, responsibility-driven, and physical-effect-driven, are identified. In this study, the physical-effect-driven mechanism is examined through an effect-strengthened implementation of the scenario-driven paradigm. While all paradigms consistently identify mission-oriented functions, the examined scenario-driven implementation enhances transparency in functional justification and improves sensitivity to interaction- and effect-induced functions, thereby reducing the risk of omission during conceptual design. By formalizing these derivation mechanisms and clarifying their complementary roles, this study contributes to a clearer methodological understanding of functional identification in early-stage complex system design, while providing practical guidance for methodological selection and integration in aircraft system design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16042028
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Case-Study-Based Comparative Evaluation of Functional Analysis Paradigms in Aircraft System Design

Yuehua Chen, Meng Zhao, Youbai XIE, Haomin Li
Applied Sciences
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
article

A Case-Study-Based Comparative Evaluation of Functional Analysis Paradigms in Aircraft System Design

Yuehua Chen, Meng Zhao, Youbai XIE, Haomin Li
article en

Abstract

Functional analysis plays a critical role in early-stage aircraft system design by defining system functions that guide downstream architectural development and verification. In practice, many design deficiencies originate not from incorrect physical realization but from incomplete or ambiguous functional definitions established at conceptual stages. This challenge is particularly pronounced in aircraft systems, where interaction- and physical-effect-induced functions tend to remain implicit and weakly justified. To address this issue, in this study, we conduct a case-study-based comparative evaluation of three functional analysis paradigms: design-theory-oriented functional decomposition, systems-engineering-based functional allocation, and scenario-driven functional analysis. Using an aircraft ground deceleration scenario as a controlled context, this comparison examines how different function-derivation mechanisms influence the identification and justification of interaction- and effect-induced functions. Through structured cross-paradigm comparison, three distinct and, in principle, reproducible derivation mechanisms, namely decomposition-driven, responsibility-driven, and physical-effect-driven, are identified. In this study, the physical-effect-driven mechanism is examined through an effect-strengthened implementation of the scenario-driven paradigm. While all paradigms consistently identify mission-oriented functions, the examined scenario-driven implementation enhances transparency in functional justification and improves sensitivity to interaction- and effect-induced functions, thereby reducing the risk of omission during conceptual design. By formalizing these derivation mechanisms and clarifying their complementary roles, this study contributes to a clearer methodological understanding of functional identification in early-stage complex system design, while providing practical guidance for methodological selection and integration in aircraft system design.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(4)
Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (China) (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Commercial Aircraft of China, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.