Void Galaxies and Active Galactic Nucleus Activity in ZOBOV-identified <tt>TNG300</tt> Voids from <i>z</i> = 3 to <i>z</i> = 0

Abstract We study void galaxies in the TNG300 simulation between redshifts z = 3 and z = 0. Cosmic void catalogs were constructed using a watershed-based void-finding algorithm, and we define four populations of field galaxies for our investigation: (1) galaxies that are members of a watershed void, (2) galaxies that are located within a radius r ≤ 0.8 R eff of the center of a void, (3) galaxies interior to spheres centered on void centers that have underdensity contrasts &lt;–0.8, and (4) nonvoid galaxies. We show that population statistics on void galaxy properties can be recovered from watershed-based void catalogs. Differences between galaxy populations are most pronounced interior to the shell-crossing surface (i.e., population 3), where densities are intermediate to high. Compared to nonvoid galaxies at all redshifts, the density-controlled galaxies are bluer, smaller, more actively star-forming, more massive, and less metal-enriched. At redshifts ≥1, these differences are less apparent, likely caused by resolution and selection effects incurred by attempting to define a density-controlled sample from a watershed-based void-finding algorithm. Further, we investigate the fraction of galaxies with active galactic nuclei (AGN) and find that our density-controlled population has AGN fractions that are significantly higher than those of nonvoid galaxy populations (79.8% ± 0.4% higher at z = 0.0 and 61.5% ± 0.7% higher at larger redshifts).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae2f48
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Void Galaxies and Active Galactic Nucleus Activity in ZOBOV-identified <tt>TNG300</tt> Voids from z = 3 to z = 0

Tereasa G. Brainerd, Bryanne McDonough, Olivia Curtis
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Void Galaxies and Active Galactic Nucleus Activity in ZOBOV-identified <tt>TNG300</tt> Voids from z = 3 to z = 0

Tereasa G. Brainerd, Bryanne McDonough, Olivia Curtis
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study void galaxies in the TNG300 simulation between redshifts z = 3 and z = 0. Cosmic void catalogs were constructed using a watershed-based void-finding algorithm, and we define four populations of field galaxies for our investigation: (1) galaxies that are members of a watershed void, (2) galaxies that are located within a radius r ≤ 0.8 R eff of the center of a void, (3) galaxies interior to spheres centered on void centers that have underdensity contrasts &lt;–0.8, and (4) nonvoid galaxies. We show that population statistics on void galaxy properties can be recovered from watershed-based void catalogs. Differences between galaxy populations are most pronounced interior to the shell-crossing surface (i.e., population 3), where densities are intermediate to high. Compared to nonvoid galaxies at all redshifts, the density-controlled galaxies are bluer, smaller, more actively star-forming, more massive, and less metal-enriched. At redshifts ≥1, these differences are less apparent, likely caused by resolution and selection effects incurred by attempting to define a density-controlled sample from a watershed-based void-finding algorithm. Further, we investigate the fraction of galaxies with active galactic nuclei (AGN) and find that our density-controlled population has AGN fractions that are significantly higher than those of nonvoid galaxy populations (79.8% ± 0.4% higher at z = 0.0 and 61.5% ± 0.7% higher at larger redshifts).

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 998(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.