Dramatisation in Deleuze and Kierkegaard: Two Formulas: The Stuttering of Language, the Question that Silences

This article examines dramatisation in Deleuze and Kierkegaard, encapsulated in the formulas ‘the stuttering of language’ and ‘the question that silences’. Deleuze’s differential approach actualises virtual ideas within a system of heterogenesis through the interplay between actual concepts and intensive dramas. Conversely, Kierkegaard’s existential approach, examined in The Concept of Anxiety, establishes an infinite loop between the psychological language of anxiety and the dogmatic language of hereditary sin, leading to a third existential language centred on the moment of appropriation. The article concludes by contrasting Deleuze’s focus on expression through internal differences with Kierkegaard’s emphasis on making an existential choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deleuze and Guattari Studies
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2026.0627
Primary Topic
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dramatisation in Deleuze and Kierkegaard: Two Formulas: The Stuttering of Language, the Question that Silences

Martijn Boven
Deleuze and Guattari Studies
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
article

Dramatisation in Deleuze and Kierkegaard: Two Formulas: The Stuttering of Language, the Question that Silences

Martijn Boven
article en

Abstract

This article examines dramatisation in Deleuze and Kierkegaard, encapsulated in the formulas ‘the stuttering of language’ and ‘the question that silences’. Deleuze’s differential approach actualises virtual ideas within a system of heterogenesis through the interplay between actual concepts and intensive dramas. Conversely, Kierkegaard’s existential approach, examined in The Concept of Anxiety, establishes an infinite loop between the psychological language of anxiety and the dogmatic language of hereditary sin, leading to a third existential language centred on the moment of appropriation. The article concludes by contrasting Deleuze’s focus on expression through internal differences with Kierkegaard’s emphasis on making an existential choice.

Deleuze and Guattari StudiesVol. 20(1)
Leiden University (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.