Leveraging Longitudinal Data to Improve <scp>BrainChart</scp> Calibration for Small Study Sample Sizes

Longitudinal brain imaging studies offer valuable insight into trajectories of brain structures over time; however, changes in acquisition scanners and protocols can introduce biases in the resulting measures. Although BrainChart provides a framework for calibrating FreeSurfer-derived brain structure measurements between studies or time points, population samples with small subject numbers ≤ 100 are known to give unstable sample effect parameter estimates. Under the assumption that centiles of control subjects are stable across time points, we present a method to improve reliability of population sample effect parameter estimation for time points in longitudinal studies that have small numbers of control participants but include a nested sample with repeat scans of some control participants at multiple time points. We verify the accuracy of this method using both simulated and real datasets, which demonstrate comparable estimates close to the ground truth and improved confidence intervals at smaller sample sizes than the original method. Additionally, our approach confirms accuracy across both time points and scanners. The software, which is available on GitHub, offers a means to extend the value of brain imaging data acquired using variable scanners and/or protocols for longitudinal studies, thus maximizing the value of brain imaging data in established cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Brain Mapping
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70476
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Longitudinal Data to Improve BrainChart Calibration for Small Study Sample Sizes

Stacey A. Sakowski, Elisabeth Northam, Taya Collyer, Velandai Srikanth et al.
Human Brain Mapping
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Leveraging Longitudinal Data to Improve BrainChart Calibration for Small Study Sample Sizes

Stacey A. Sakowski, Elisabeth Northam, Taya Collyer, Velandai Srikanth, Richard Anthony Beare, Chris Moran, Fergus J. Cameron, Chris Adamson, Amy Brown
article en

Abstract

Longitudinal brain imaging studies offer valuable insight into trajectories of brain structures over time; however, changes in acquisition scanners and protocols can introduce biases in the resulting measures. Although BrainChart provides a framework for calibrating FreeSurfer-derived brain structure measurements between studies or time points, population samples with small subject numbers ≤ 100 are known to give unstable sample effect parameter estimates. Under the assumption that centiles of control subjects are stable across time points, we present a method to improve reliability of population sample effect parameter estimation for time points in longitudinal studies that have small numbers of control participants but include a nested sample with repeat scans of some control participants at multiple time points. We verify the accuracy of this method using both simulated and real datasets, which demonstrate comparable estimates close to the ground truth and improved confidence intervals at smaller sample sizes than the original method. Additionally, our approach confirms accuracy across both time points and scanners. The software, which is available on GitHub, offers a means to extend the value of brain imaging data acquired using variable scanners and/or protocols for longitudinal studies, thus maximizing the value of brain imaging data in established cohorts.

Human Brain MappingVol. 47(3)
Royal Children's Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Michigan (US), Caulfield Hospital (AU), Peninsula Health (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.