MyAlliance for Brain Health for Research Recruitment: Evaluation of Community Partnership Experiences Using a Mixed-Methods Approach

Establishing partnerships with trusted community organizations is a well-established strategy to reach communities underrepresented in medical research. Community organizations are trusted sources of information and services, with the potential to improve research readiness within communities. Literature suggests that research participation is facilitated by initial practices such as relationship- building, inclusive design, and accessibility, which ultimately lead to a sense of openness and trust among community members. However, the value of collaborative efforts between partnering organizations can be difficult to measure and evaluate. Following a community-engaged research recruitment project, MyAlliance for Brain Health, we evaluated how organizational stakeholders perceived community-academic research partnerships established during the grant period using a mixed-methods approach. Qualitative data was obtained through semi-structured interviews with six different organizational and program leaders, and quantitative data was collected through a short community-partner survey aimed at measuring actual vs. preferred engagement. Interview findings indicated that in general, organizational and program leaders appeared to place more emphasis on the value of partnering relationships than they did on perceived challenges. Survey data supported this finding, revealing that the actual level of engagement across different grant activities was similar to what community partners would like to see going forward. Interview data also revealed that organizations shared more common successes than they shared common challenges, suggesting that challenges were mostly unique to specific community organizations. Our findings support community engagement models that value sustained relationships as a path towards readiness to engage with dementia research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54656/mg117g72
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MyAlliance for Brain Health for Research Recruitment: Evaluation of Community Partnership Experiences Using a Mixed-Methods Approach

Susan C. Sprague, Eric D. Vidoni, Ashley R. Shaw, Mickeal N. Key et al.
Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship
Community Health and Development
article

MyAlliance for Brain Health for Research Recruitment: Evaluation of Community Partnership Experiences Using a Mixed-Methods Approach

Susan C. Sprague, Eric D. Vidoni, Ashley R. Shaw, Mickeal N. Key, Jannette Berkley‐Patton, Jeffrey Murray Burns, Tina Lewandowski, Erica Andrade, Melissa Robinson, Jeriel Bohall, Jaime Perales-Puchalt, Kelli N. Barton, Rashelle Hoffman, W. Todd Moore
article en

Abstract

Establishing partnerships with trusted community organizations is a well-established strategy to reach communities underrepresented in medical research. Community organizations are trusted sources of information and services, with the potential to improve research readiness within communities. Literature suggests that research participation is facilitated by initial practices such as relationship- building, inclusive design, and accessibility, which ultimately lead to a sense of openness and trust among community members. However, the value of collaborative efforts between partnering organizations can be difficult to measure and evaluate. Following a community-engaged research recruitment project, MyAlliance for Brain Health, we evaluated how organizational stakeholders perceived community-academic research partnerships established during the grant period using a mixed-methods approach. Qualitative data was obtained through semi-structured interviews with six different organizational and program leaders, and quantitative data was collected through a short community-partner survey aimed at measuring actual vs. preferred engagement. Interview findings indicated that in general, organizational and program leaders appeared to place more emphasis on the value of partnering relationships than they did on perceived challenges. Survey data supported this finding, revealing that the actual level of engagement across different grant activities was similar to what community partners would like to see going forward. Interview data also revealed that organizations shared more common successes than they shared common challenges, suggesting that challenges were mostly unique to specific community organizations. Our findings support community engagement models that value sustained relationships as a path towards readiness to engage with dementia research.

Journal of Community Engagement and ScholarshipVol. 19(1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.