<b>University Students' Interactions with ChatGPT: An Investigation in terms of CoI, Motivation, and Learning Strategies </b>

The research aims to investigate the effects of ChatGPT in the context of the Community of Inquiry framework, Motivation, and Students’ learning strategies. In the study, there are two instructional methods. One group was included in open inquiry + lecturing, and the other was included in ChatGPT as a teaching assistant method. Both groups participated in a four-week instruction process consisting of two hours each. According to CoI index measurements, there is a significant difference in favor of males, but there is no differentiation in Motivation and Learning strategies measurements according to gender. There is a difference in favor of ChatGPT as a teaching assistant method regarding teaching presence, cognitive presence, and CoI index total score. There is a difference in favor of the ChatGPT as a teaching assistant method in terms of motivation. However, there is no differentiation in terms of learning strategies used by students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology in Education
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.5419
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Students' Interactions with ChatGPT: An Investigation in terms of CoI, Motivation, and Learning Strategies

Mustafa Serkan Günbatar, Şahin Gökçearslan
International Journal of Technology in Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

University Students' Interactions with ChatGPT: An Investigation in terms of CoI, Motivation, and Learning Strategies

Mustafa Serkan Günbatar, Şahin Gökçearslan
article en

Abstract

The research aims to investigate the effects of ChatGPT in the context of the Community of Inquiry framework, Motivation, and Students’ learning strategies. In the study, there are two instructional methods. One group was included in open inquiry + lecturing, and the other was included in ChatGPT as a teaching assistant method. Both groups participated in a four-week instruction process consisting of two hours each. According to CoI index measurements, there is a significant difference in favor of males, but there is no differentiation in Motivation and Learning strategies measurements according to gender. There is a difference in favor of ChatGPT as a teaching assistant method regarding teaching presence, cognitive presence, and CoI index total score. There is a difference in favor of the ChatGPT as a teaching assistant method in terms of motivation. However, there is no differentiation in terms of learning strategies used by students.

International Journal of Technology in EducationVol. 9(2)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.