Morphological variance in cave and surface populations of Asellus aquaticus challenges the fluctuating selection and greater male variability hypotheses

Introduction Fluctuating selection, the changes in the strength and/or direction of natural selection stemming from fine-scale spatio-temporal environmental variation, is a fundamental, yet rarely tested explanation for the maintenance of phenotypic variation within populations. Asellus aquaticus is an aquatic isopod inhabiting both surface (highly variable, complex environment) and cave (stable, simple environment) habitats, providing an excellent model to test the fluctuating selection hypothesis. The inclusion of multiple populations allows to explore variance patterns among-populations. We predicted that within-population variance (V wp ) is lower in caves due to negligible environmental variation. Regarding among-population variance (V ip ) the study was exploratory as in caves, (i) lower variance could be expected due to their high environmental similarity, but (ii) higher variance could be expected due to the mutual isolation of caves. Finaly, we tested whether males exhibit higher morphological variance than females following predictions of the greater male variability hypothesis. Methods We analysed the variance of 12 functional morphological traits of eight cave and nine surface A. aquaticus populations. Two statistical approaches were applied. Trait variances were determined for each sex using Bayesian double-hierarchical models. Then overall V wp and V ip was estimated for each sex and habitat using Bayesian generalised linear models. Results Overall V wp did not differ between the habitats but in some traits, variance was larger in cave than in surface populations (12.5% of cases). Overall V ip was larger in caves. There were no sex-related V wp patterns, but we found higher V ip in males than in females in the cave habitat. Discussion Our results reject both the fluctuating selection and greater male variability hypotheses. We suggest that equal V wp between habitats is a result of several processes overriding the marked habitat difference in environmental heterogeneity. Higher V ip in caves suggests the importance of isolation allowing local adaptation to cave specificities. Higher V ip in males in caves suggests the role of sexual selection in among-cave population divergence. These results underscore unmeasured differences among the caves and challenge the general view that caves are uniform replicates of simple and stable environments. For solid evolutionary inference, we recommend considering patterns of variance besides means.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2026.1748446
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morphological variance in cave and surface populations of Asellus aquaticus challenges the fluctuating selection and greater male variability hypotheses

Gábor Herczeg, Gergely Horváth, Serban Mircea Sarbu, Anna Bíró et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

Morphological variance in cave and surface populations of Asellus aquaticus challenges the fluctuating selection and greater male variability hypotheses

Gábor Herczeg, Gergely Horváth, Serban Mircea Sarbu, Anna Bíró, Gergely Balázs, Žiga Fišer, Cene Fišer
article en

Abstract

Introduction Fluctuating selection, the changes in the strength and/or direction of natural selection stemming from fine-scale spatio-temporal environmental variation, is a fundamental, yet rarely tested explanation for the maintenance of phenotypic variation within populations. Asellus aquaticus is an aquatic isopod inhabiting both surface (highly variable, complex environment) and cave (stable, simple environment) habitats, providing an excellent model to test the fluctuating selection hypothesis. The inclusion of multiple populations allows to explore variance patterns among-populations. We predicted that within-population variance (V wp ) is lower in caves due to negligible environmental variation. Regarding among-population variance (V ip ) the study was exploratory as in caves, (i) lower variance could be expected due to their high environmental similarity, but (ii) higher variance could be expected due to the mutual isolation of caves. Finaly, we tested whether males exhibit higher morphological variance than females following predictions of the greater male variability hypothesis. Methods We analysed the variance of 12 functional morphological traits of eight cave and nine surface A. aquaticus populations. Two statistical approaches were applied. Trait variances were determined for each sex using Bayesian double-hierarchical models. Then overall V wp and V ip was estimated for each sex and habitat using Bayesian generalised linear models. Results Overall V wp did not differ between the habitats but in some traits, variance was larger in cave than in surface populations (12.5% of cases). Overall V ip was larger in caves. There were no sex-related V wp patterns, but we found higher V ip in males than in females in the cave habitat. Discussion Our results reject both the fluctuating selection and greater male variability hypotheses. We suggest that equal V wp between habitats is a result of several processes overriding the marked habitat difference in environmental heterogeneity. Higher V ip in caves suggests the importance of isolation allowing local adaptation to cave specificities. Higher V ip in males in caves suggests the role of sexual selection in among-cave population divergence. These results underscore unmeasured differences among the caves and challenge the general view that caves are uniform replicates of simple and stable environments. For solid evolutionary inference, we recommend considering patterns of variance besides means.

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 14
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), California State University System (US), University of Ljubljana (SI), Integra (United States) (US), Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology (RO)
Biodiversa+, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.