Self-reporting quality of life in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia: Comparing capability and health-focused measures using response process validation

While self-reporting remains feasible in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia, capability measures pose greater cognitive demands than health-focused measures, primarily due to comprehension of abstract concepts and distinguishing capability from functioning rather than memory retrieval. Measures should be validated for specific dementia subtypes, and hybrid approaches anchoring capability judgements in concrete experiences warrant exploration. This exploratory study provides preliminary response process validity evidence to inform measure selection in dementia research and clinical practice, ensuring people living with dementia can meaningfully participate in health economics and policy decisions that affect their care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119102
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-reporting quality of life in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia: Comparing capability and health-focused measures using response process validation

Rachel Fitzpatrick, Coast Joanna, Jayne Conlon, Iracema Leroi et al.
Social Science & Medicine
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Self-reporting quality of life in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia: Comparing capability and health-focused measures using response process validation

Rachel Fitzpatrick, Coast Joanna, Jayne Conlon, Iracema Leroi, Erin Boland, Irina Kinchin
article en

Abstract

While self-reporting remains feasible in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia, capability measures pose greater cognitive demands than health-focused measures, primarily due to comprehension of abstract concepts and distinguishing capability from functioning rather than memory retrieval. Measures should be validated for specific dementia subtypes, and hybrid approaches anchoring capability judgements in concrete experiences warrant exploration. This exploratory study provides preliminary response process validity evidence to inform measure selection in dementia research and clinical practice, ensuring people living with dementia can meaningfully participate in health economics and policy decisions that affect their care.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 396
Trinity College Dublin (IE), At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-reporting quality of life in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia: Comparing capability and health-focused measures using response process validation — Rachel Fitzpatrick, Coast Joanna, et al. · Social Science & Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS