Toward a Functional and Conceptual Framework for Adhesive Materials: The Role of Etching Technique

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The classification of adhesive systems has historically relied on the type of etching agent and the sequence of application steps, distinguishing etch-and-rinse and self-etch categories. However, these models do not encompass the versatility introduced by universal adhesives or other emerging polymeric materials. This review aimed to integrate etching technique as a defining parameter within adhesive classification, linking material composition, bonding strategy, and clinical execution into a coherent functional framework. <b>Methods</b>: A structured narrative review of experimental, translational, and clinical studies published between 2010 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed and Scopus. Literature addressing adhesive categories, etching strategies, etching techniques, and smear layer characteristics was critically synthesized to identify functional relationships relevant to bonding performance and clinical decision-making. <b>Results</b>: The proposed taxonomy classifies materials as conventional, universal, touch-cure primers, self-adhesive/universal, and glass ionomer cements. Bonding strategies are organized as etch-and-rinse, self-etch, pre-etched, and unassisted, while etching techniques are defined as selective or nonselective families encompassing five clinically defined techniques. Incorporating etching technique clarifies the role of smear layer density, the acidity of adhesive materials, and functional monomer reactivity in demineralization and bonding. This structure enhances the understanding and teaching of adhesive concepts and supports evidence-based clinical selection of materials and techniques. <b>Conclusions</b>: Integrating etching technique into adhesive classification provides a functional and dynamic framework that unifies material, strategy, and technique. This taxonomy facilitates clinical decision-making and can evolve with future adhesive formulations. Further independent, long-term studies are warranted to validate the proposed combinations of materials and etching procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14020119
Primary Topic
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Functional and Conceptual Framework for Adhesive Materials: The Role of Etching Technique

Miguel Angel Muñoz, Issis Luque-Martínez
Dentistry Journal
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
article

Toward a Functional and Conceptual Framework for Adhesive Materials: The Role of Etching Technique

Miguel Angel Muñoz, Issis Luque-Martínez
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The classification of adhesive systems has historically relied on the type of etching agent and the sequence of application steps, distinguishing etch-and-rinse and self-etch categories. However, these models do not encompass the versatility introduced by universal adhesives or other emerging polymeric materials. This review aimed to integrate etching technique as a defining parameter within adhesive classification, linking material composition, bonding strategy, and clinical execution into a coherent functional framework. <b>Methods</b>: A structured narrative review of experimental, translational, and clinical studies published between 2010 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed and Scopus. Literature addressing adhesive categories, etching strategies, etching techniques, and smear layer characteristics was critically synthesized to identify functional relationships relevant to bonding performance and clinical decision-making. <b>Results</b>: The proposed taxonomy classifies materials as conventional, universal, touch-cure primers, self-adhesive/universal, and glass ionomer cements. Bonding strategies are organized as etch-and-rinse, self-etch, pre-etched, and unassisted, while etching techniques are defined as selective or nonselective families encompassing five clinically defined techniques. Incorporating etching technique clarifies the role of smear layer density, the acidity of adhesive materials, and functional monomer reactivity in demineralization and bonding. This structure enhances the understanding and teaching of adhesive concepts and supports evidence-based clinical selection of materials and techniques. <b>Conclusions</b>: Integrating etching technique into adhesive classification provides a functional and dynamic framework that unifies material, strategy, and technique. This taxonomy facilitates clinical decision-making and can evolve with future adhesive formulations. Further independent, long-term studies are warranted to validate the proposed combinations of materials and etching procedures.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(2)
University of Valparaíso (CL)
Universidad de Valparaíso, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.