Comparison of allergen ELISA kits for soy detection in multiple food matrices

Soybeans are widely used as a protein source in food, but even trace amounts can trigger harmful reactions in allergic individuals. To minimize safety risks, food producers can use commercially available ELISA kits to detect unintended soy presence. However, selecting the appropriate ELISA kit is challenging due to limited information on assay performance across different matrices. Therefore, this study compared seven commercial soy ELISA kits across nine different food matrices: cookie, chocolate, beverages, snacks, plant-based drinks and products, dairy products, ice cream, meat replacers and herbs/spices. Soy content was quantified as milligram of total soy protein per kilogram of the food product, in both soy-spiked and incurred food products. Recovery, intra-assay, and inter-assay variability were evaluated for the spiked matrices. All kits could qualitatively detect soy at the eliciting dose (ED01) of 0.5 mg total soy protein based on relevant consumption size for each matrix. Quantitatively, detected soy concentrations increased with higher soy levels, though recovery varied by kit and matrix. The number of ELISA kits meeting recovery criteria was as follows: dairy products (7), cookies (6), ice cream (6), plant-based drinks and products (6), snacks (5), beverages (5), herbs/spices (5), chocolate (4), and meat replacers (3). Meat replacers proved the most challenging matrix, with only three kits meeting the criteria. These findings provide comparative performance data for commercially available soy ELISA kits and can assist the food industry in selecting appropriate methods for reliable soy detection in specific matrices, contributing to improved allergen risk management and consumer safety. • The seven kits were able to detect soy qualitatively at the level of 0.5 mg soy protein. • Nine soy relevant food matrices were tested. • Quantitative performance of the test kits varied with the food matrices. • Most challenging matrices were meat and meat replacers showing high matrix effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Control
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2026.112062
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of allergen ELISA kits for soy detection in multiple food matrices

Marleen M. Voorhuijzen, Nathalie GE Smits, H.J. van der Fels-Klerx, Elise F. Hoek-van den Hil et al.
Food Control
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Comparison of allergen ELISA kits for soy detection in multiple food matrices

Marleen M. Voorhuijzen, Nathalie GE Smits, H.J. van der Fels-Klerx, Elise F. Hoek-van den Hil, Elike Treffers, Bart van der Nagel
article en

Abstract

Soybeans are widely used as a protein source in food, but even trace amounts can trigger harmful reactions in allergic individuals. To minimize safety risks, food producers can use commercially available ELISA kits to detect unintended soy presence. However, selecting the appropriate ELISA kit is challenging due to limited information on assay performance across different matrices. Therefore, this study compared seven commercial soy ELISA kits across nine different food matrices: cookie, chocolate, beverages, snacks, plant-based drinks and products, dairy products, ice cream, meat replacers and herbs/spices. Soy content was quantified as milligram of total soy protein per kilogram of the food product, in both soy-spiked and incurred food products. Recovery, intra-assay, and inter-assay variability were evaluated for the spiked matrices. All kits could qualitatively detect soy at the eliciting dose (ED01) of 0.5 mg total soy protein based on relevant consumption size for each matrix. Quantitatively, detected soy concentrations increased with higher soy levels, though recovery varied by kit and matrix. The number of ELISA kits meeting recovery criteria was as follows: dairy products (7), cookies (6), ice cream (6), plant-based drinks and products (6), snacks (5), beverages (5), herbs/spices (5), chocolate (4), and meat replacers (3). Meat replacers proved the most challenging matrix, with only three kits meeting the criteria. These findings provide comparative performance data for commercially available soy ELISA kits and can assist the food industry in selecting appropriate methods for reliable soy detection in specific matrices, contributing to improved allergen risk management and consumer safety. • The seven kits were able to detect soy qualitatively at the level of 0.5 mg soy protein. • Nine soy relevant food matrices were tested. • Quantitative performance of the test kits varied with the food matrices. • Most challenging matrices were meat and meat replacers showing high matrix effects.

Food ControlVol. 185
GGD Amsterdam (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Danone
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.