Pesticide-free agriculture: Is a third way possible besides organic and conventional agriculture?

Pesticides are widely used in agriculture to protect crops from animal pests, diseases, and weeds, helping to maintain yields under diverse production conditions. However, their widespread and repeated use has led to environmental contamination, biodiversity loss, and growing concerns about human health. While Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and organic farming have sought to reduce pesticide dependency, both approaches still permit pesticide use, and their adoption remains limited due to technical and economic constraints. In this context, we explore the feasibility of a third way: pesticide-free agriculture based on agroecological crop protection (ACP) principles. Drawing from the Rés0Pest experimental network launched in France in 2012, we present ten years of results from nine sites covering a range of pedo-climatic conditions and socio-economic contexts. Rés0Pest implemented cropping systems that excluded all pesticide use, including seed treatments, while maintaining synthetic fertilizer inputs. The systems were co-designed through participatory methods, following a system experiment approach that evaluates the effects of a combination of cropping practices and their interactions on cropping system performance over the long term. Results showed that in pesticide-free systems, it is possible to achieve yields comparable to conventional and higher than organic systems and, in some cases, generate higher net farm income. Pest and pathogen crop damage did not significantly increase over time, although weed management remained a key challenge. These findings suggest that technically and economically viable pesticide-free arable systems are possible under certain conditions, and that new solutions are needed to support their adoption across a wider range of contexts. We discuss implications for research, farming, and policy, and emphasize the need for adaptive experimentation and systemic performance assessment to support agroecological transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Disease
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-09-25-1839-fe
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pesticide-free agriculture: Is a third way possible besides organic and conventional agriculture?

Mark L. Gleason, Guillaume Audebert, V. Deytieux, B Bertier et al.
Plant Disease
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Pesticide-free agriculture: Is a third way possible besides organic and conventional agriculture?

Mark L. Gleason, Guillaume Audebert, V. Deytieux, B Bertier, Sébastien Darras, J. Pirault, Rosemonde Devaux, Ludivine Pirus, Antoine Savoie, Vincent Cellier, Marie Hélène Robin, Guilles Tison, Diana Carolina Ortiz-Vallejo, Jean-Noel Aubertot, Caroline Colnenne-David
article en

Abstract

Pesticides are widely used in agriculture to protect crops from animal pests, diseases, and weeds, helping to maintain yields under diverse production conditions. However, their widespread and repeated use has led to environmental contamination, biodiversity loss, and growing concerns about human health. While Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and organic farming have sought to reduce pesticide dependency, both approaches still permit pesticide use, and their adoption remains limited due to technical and economic constraints. In this context, we explore the feasibility of a third way: pesticide-free agriculture based on agroecological crop protection (ACP) principles. Drawing from the Rés0Pest experimental network launched in France in 2012, we present ten years of results from nine sites covering a range of pedo-climatic conditions and socio-economic contexts. Rés0Pest implemented cropping systems that excluded all pesticide use, including seed treatments, while maintaining synthetic fertilizer inputs. The systems were co-designed through participatory methods, following a system experiment approach that evaluates the effects of a combination of cropping practices and their interactions on cropping system performance over the long term. Results showed that in pesticide-free systems, it is possible to achieve yields comparable to conventional and higher than organic systems and, in some cases, generate higher net farm income. Pest and pathogen crop damage did not significantly increase over time, although weed management remained a key challenge. These findings suggest that technically and economically viable pesticide-free arable systems are possible under certain conditions, and that new solutions are needed to support their adoption across a wider range of contexts. We discuss implications for research, farming, and policy, and emphasize the need for adaptive experimentation and systemic performance assessment to support agroecological transitions.

Plant Disease
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (MA), Iowa State University (US), Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse (FR), AgroParisTech (FR), Agropolis International (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Ecole d'Ingénieurs de PURPAN (FR), Toxicologie Alimentaire (FR), Département Santé Animale (FR), AGroecologies, Innovations & Ruralities (FR), Hôpital Fernand-Widal (FR), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), Time Domain (United States) (US), Institut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Occitanie-Montpellier (FR), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (FR)
European Commission, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.