Quality versus quantity of training datasets for artificial intelligence–based whole liver segmentation

Artificial intelligence (AI) based segmentation has many medical applications but limited curated datasets challenge model training; this study compares the impact of dataset annotation quality and quantity on whole liver AI segmentation performance. We obtained 3,089 abdominal computed tomography scans with whole-liver contours from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) and a MICCAI challenge. A total of 249 scans were withheld for testing of which 30, MICCAI challenge data, were reserved for external validation. The remaining scans were divided into mixed-curation and highly-curated groups, randomly sampled into sub-datasets of various sizes, and used to train 3D nnU-Net segmentation models. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), surface DSC with 2mm margins (SD 2mm), the 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95), and 2D axial slice DSC (Slice DSC) were used to evaluate model performance. The highly curated, 244-scan model (DSC=0.971, SD 2mm=0.958, HD95=2.98mm) performed insignificantly different on 3D evaluation metrics to the mixed-curation 2,840-scan model (DSC=0.971 [<i>p</i>>.999], SD 2mm=0.958 [<i>p</i>>.999], HD95=2.87mm [p>.999]). The 710-scan mixed-curation (Slice DSC=0.929) significantly outperformed the highly curated, 244-scan model (Slice DSC=0.923 [<i>p</i>=0.012]) on the 30 external scans. Highly curated datasets yielded equivalent performance to datasets that were a full order of magnitude larger. The benefits of larger, mixed-curation datasets are evidenced in model generalizability metrics and local improvements. In conclusion, tradeoffs between dataset quality and quantity for model training are nuanced and goal dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.17.26346486
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality versus quantity of training datasets for artificial intelligence–based whole liver segmentation

Aashish C. Gupta, Caleb O'Connor, Bruno Calazans Odisio, Brian Anderson et al.
medRxiv
AI in cancer detection
article

Quality versus quantity of training datasets for artificial intelligence–based whole liver segmentation

Aashish C. Gupta, Caleb O'Connor, Bruno Calazans Odisio, Brian Anderson, McKell Woodland, Tien T. Tang, Mais Altaie, Kristy K Brock
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) based segmentation has many medical applications but limited curated datasets challenge model training; this study compares the impact of dataset annotation quality and quantity on whole liver AI segmentation performance. We obtained 3,089 abdominal computed tomography scans with whole-liver contours from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) and a MICCAI challenge. A total of 249 scans were withheld for testing of which 30, MICCAI challenge data, were reserved for external validation. The remaining scans were divided into mixed-curation and highly-curated groups, randomly sampled into sub-datasets of various sizes, and used to train 3D nnU-Net segmentation models. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), surface DSC with 2mm margins (SD 2mm), the 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95), and 2D axial slice DSC (Slice DSC) were used to evaluate model performance. The highly curated, 244-scan model (DSC=0.971, SD 2mm=0.958, HD95=2.98mm) performed insignificantly different on 3D evaluation metrics to the mixed-curation 2,840-scan model (DSC=0.971 [<i>p</i>>.999], SD 2mm=0.958 [<i>p</i>>.999], HD95=2.87mm [p>.999]). The 710-scan mixed-curation (Slice DSC=0.929) significantly outperformed the highly curated, 244-scan model (Slice DSC=0.923 [<i>p</i>=0.012]) on the 30 external scans. Highly curated datasets yielded equivalent performance to datasets that were a full order of magnitude larger. The benefits of larger, mixed-curation datasets are evidenced in model generalizability metrics and local improvements. In conclusion, tradeoffs between dataset quality and quantity for model training are nuanced and goal dependent.

medRxiv
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Foundation, National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.