Individual-level patterns in the random forest classification of fricatives in conversational English

This study uses a corpus of sociolinguistic interview speech from Western Canadian English to examine individual-level patterns in random forest classification models for fricatives. The models include 23 spectral, durational, and amplitudinal measures commonly used for group-level analyses. Results reveal that measures such as midpoint standard deviation, spectral peak frequency, peak power, and segment duration can capture meaningful distinctions within individual speakers, with some acoustic cues playing a greater role in distinguishing fricatives within speakers than across them. Limiting models to the ten most important predictors slightly increased classification error, suggesting the importance of broader acoustic information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JASA Express Letters
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0042480
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual-level patterns in the random forest classification of fricatives in conversational English

Viktor Kharlamov, Daniel Brenner, Benjamin V. Tucker
JASA Express Letters
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Individual-level patterns in the random forest classification of fricatives in conversational English

Viktor Kharlamov, Daniel Brenner, Benjamin V. Tucker
article en

Abstract

This study uses a corpus of sociolinguistic interview speech from Western Canadian English to examine individual-level patterns in random forest classification models for fricatives. The models include 23 spectral, durational, and amplitudinal measures commonly used for group-level analyses. Results reveal that measures such as midpoint standard deviation, spectral peak frequency, peak power, and segment duration can capture meaningful distinctions within individual speakers, with some acoustic cues playing a greater role in distinguishing fricatives within speakers than across them. Limiting models to the ten most important predictors slightly increased classification error, suggesting the importance of broader acoustic information.

JASA Express LettersVol. 6(2)
University of Arizona (US), Northern Arizona University (US), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.