The Conceptual Structure of Organisational Justice and Injustice: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT Organisational justice has become a well‐established part of the scientific literature, and the links between organisational justice and workplace outcomes have been the subject of numerous studies. Whilst organisational justice is recognised as a factor contributing to well‐being and performance, injustice produces detrimental effects. The research question arises as to whether organisational justice and injustice are opposite ends of the same dimension or two distinct concepts. This scoping review aims at clarifying this issue, which is crucial for developing specific and effective interventions aimed at improving worker mental health and organisational performance. Within the 186 sources of evidence that met the inclusion criteria, 25 provide direct insights about the conceptual structure or the distinction between justice and injustice. Additionally, 86 measurement scales were identified, which offer valuable information about justice/injustice operationalisation. This work reveals a scarcity of theorical foundation and empirical evidence that would allow for a clear answer as to whether justice and injustice are or are not two distinct concepts. Given the current state of knowledge, the conceptual structure of justice and injustice remains an underexplored subject of academic debate that warrants further investigation. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article’s .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70225
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Conceptual Structure of Organisational Justice and Injustice: A Scoping Review

Valérie Le Floch, Nadine Cascino, Valérie Nguyen
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

The Conceptual Structure of Organisational Justice and Injustice: A Scoping Review

Valérie Le Floch, Nadine Cascino, Valérie Nguyen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Organisational justice has become a well‐established part of the scientific literature, and the links between organisational justice and workplace outcomes have been the subject of numerous studies. Whilst organisational justice is recognised as a factor contributing to well‐being and performance, injustice produces detrimental effects. The research question arises as to whether organisational justice and injustice are opposite ends of the same dimension or two distinct concepts. This scoping review aims at clarifying this issue, which is crucial for developing specific and effective interventions aimed at improving worker mental health and organisational performance. Within the 186 sources of evidence that met the inclusion criteria, 25 provide direct insights about the conceptual structure or the distinction between justice and injustice. Additionally, 86 measurement scales were identified, which offer valuable information about justice/injustice operationalisation. This work reveals a scarcity of theorical foundation and empirical evidence that would allow for a clear answer as to whether justice and injustice are or are not two distinct concepts. Given the current state of knowledge, the conceptual structure of justice and injustice remains an underexplored subject of academic debate that warrants further investigation. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article’s .

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 36(2)
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.