Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: Patterns, Gaps, and Institutional Readiness

Abstract Introduction: This study examines how widely students are using generative AI tools in higher education and whether they feel prepared and supported by their institutions in doing so. Methods: This study used descriptive analysis of survey responses from 3,839 students across 16 countries to examine AI use, preparedness, and institutional support. Results: Most students (86%) reported using AI, yet few felt prepared (23%) and many cited inadequate institutional guidance. Discussion: Findings reveal a clear gap between students’ rapid adoption of AI tools and limited institutional readiness to support them. Limitations: The study relies on voluntary, self-reported, cross-sectional data that may involve selection bias and cannot establish causality. Conclusions: Results highlight the need for stronger AI literacy, updated assessments, and clearer institutional guidance for responsible AI use in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Educationis Generalis
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2026-0004
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: Patterns, Gaps, and Institutional Readiness

Matthew Metzgar
Acta Educationis Generalis
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: Patterns, Gaps, and Institutional Readiness

Matthew Metzgar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: This study examines how widely students are using generative AI tools in higher education and whether they feel prepared and supported by their institutions in doing so. Methods: This study used descriptive analysis of survey responses from 3,839 students across 16 countries to examine AI use, preparedness, and institutional support. Results: Most students (86%) reported using AI, yet few felt prepared (23%) and many cited inadequate institutional guidance. Discussion: Findings reveal a clear gap between students’ rapid adoption of AI tools and limited institutional readiness to support them. Limitations: The study relies on voluntary, self-reported, cross-sectional data that may involve selection bias and cannot establish causality. Conclusions: Results highlight the need for stronger AI literacy, updated assessments, and clearer institutional guidance for responsible AI use in higher education.

Acta Educationis GeneralisVol. 16(1)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.