Intelligibility of Chinese-accented English: A methodological review

In this article, we reviewed how the intelligibility of Chinese-accented English has been measured in prior works by examining 13 studies retrieved from three databases. The methodologies used in the selected studies were categorized into four task types that measured intelligibility from different perspectives. Specifically, these four task types were forced-choice, open-ended, meaning-comprehension, and accent rating tasks. This analysis revealed that open-ended tasks involving a transcription of speech were employed by the studies most frequently. At the same time, some studies demonstrated conceptual confusion between intelligibility and comprehensibility, which led to the inappropriate measurement of intelligibility. The current review also highlighted methodological limitations that should be addressed more carefully in future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2025.12.115.401
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligibility of Chinese-accented English: A methodological review

Ye-Jee Jung, Jiyang Yoon
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Intelligibility of Chinese-accented English: A methodological review

Ye-Jee Jung, Jiyang Yoon
article en

Abstract

In this article, we reviewed how the intelligibility of Chinese-accented English has been measured in prior works by examining 13 studies retrieved from three databases. The methodologies used in the selected studies were categorized into four task types that measured intelligibility from different perspectives. Specifically, these four task types were forced-choice, open-ended, meaning-comprehension, and accent rating tasks. This analysis revealed that open-ended tasks involving a transcription of speech were employed by the studies most frequently. At the same time, some studies demonstrated conceptual confusion between intelligibility and comprehensibility, which led to the inappropriate measurement of intelligibility. The current review also highlighted methodological limitations that should be addressed more carefully in future research.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 115
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intelligibility of Chinese-accented English: A methodological review — Ye-Jee Jung, Jiyang Yoon · The Journal of Linguistics Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS