The Utilization and Influence of Online Review Websites in Plastic Surgery

<b>Introduction:</b> Online reviews have become an influential factor in shaping patient perceptions and patient-physician engagement. Prior studies have demonstrated that a single positive review on RealSelf.com was associated with a 30% increase in aesthetic surgery volume, and that review quantity more strongly affects patient perceptions and behaviors than average rating. <b>Methods:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and influence of online reviews among plastic surgery patients. A cross-sectional survey of 111 adult plastic surgery patients was conducted to assess the role of online reviews in surgeon selection and patient perceptions. <b>Results:</b> Among respondents, 8.3% identified their surgeon through online reviews, while 45% researched their surgeon prior to their visit. Overall, 77% of patients regarded online reviews as both accurate and important. A significant difference in perceived accuracy was observed between patients referred, recommended, or influenced by advertisement and those who used the internet to find their surgeon (<i>P</i> = .043, n = 84). Elective and nontrauma patients were significantly more likely to research their surgeon than cancer and reconstructive patients (<i>P</i> = .004, n = 97). The most valued review characteristics were a high overall rating (60%), reviews with the presence of text (23%), and a large number of reviews (17%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Online reviews represent an influential resource for patients considering plastic surgery. Understanding how patients utilize this resource raises surgeon awareness of patient perceptions and this relatively new phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503261419806
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Utilization and Influence of Online Review Websites in Plastic Surgery

Derek B. Asserson, Devra B. Becker, Ellen Z. Wei
Plastic Surgery
Social Media in Health Education
article

The Utilization and Influence of Online Review Websites in Plastic Surgery

Derek B. Asserson, Devra B. Becker, Ellen Z. Wei
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Online reviews have become an influential factor in shaping patient perceptions and patient-physician engagement. Prior studies have demonstrated that a single positive review on RealSelf.com was associated with a 30% increase in aesthetic surgery volume, and that review quantity more strongly affects patient perceptions and behaviors than average rating. <b>Methods:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and influence of online reviews among plastic surgery patients. A cross-sectional survey of 111 adult plastic surgery patients was conducted to assess the role of online reviews in surgeon selection and patient perceptions. <b>Results:</b> Among respondents, 8.3% identified their surgeon through online reviews, while 45% researched their surgeon prior to their visit. Overall, 77% of patients regarded online reviews as both accurate and important. A significant difference in perceived accuracy was observed between patients referred, recommended, or influenced by advertisement and those who used the internet to find their surgeon (<i>P</i> = .043, n = 84). Elective and nontrauma patients were significantly more likely to research their surgeon than cancer and reconstructive patients (<i>P</i> = .004, n = 97). The most valued review characteristics were a high overall rating (60%), reviews with the presence of text (23%), and a large number of reviews (17%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Online reviews represent an influential resource for patients considering plastic surgery. Understanding how patients utilize this resource raises surgeon awareness of patient perceptions and this relatively new phenomenon.

Plastic Surgery
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.