<scp>ISD</scp> (inherently safer design) considerations for blue ammonia projects

Abstract As the energy industry is exploring new opportunities in the blue ammonia productions, there is the need to increase awareness of the opportunity to incorporate inherently safer design (ISD) considerations particularly in the front end of the project development where there is the greatest opportunity to implement ISD measures. The hazards associated with each of these process modules may not always be well recognized. As a result, the pre‐FEED (front‐end engineering design) phase may miss the greatest opportunity to introduce corresponding ISD measures that will greatly reduce the required engineering barriers in the later project phases. The aim of this paper is to illustrate a risk‐based approach to this process, starting with hazard identification, followed by ISD goal identification and implementation. This paper will also highlight key lessons learned, including important ISD measures that may be missed by typical engineering contractors, and the key focus areas that process safety engineers should address in pre‐FEED to mitigate process safety risks in a typical integrated blue ammonia production facility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety Progress
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.70047
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ISD (inherently safer design) considerations for blue ammonia projects

Chee Seang Ong
Process Safety Progress
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

ISD (inherently safer design) considerations for blue ammonia projects

Chee Seang Ong
article en

Abstract

Abstract As the energy industry is exploring new opportunities in the blue ammonia productions, there is the need to increase awareness of the opportunity to incorporate inherently safer design (ISD) considerations particularly in the front end of the project development where there is the greatest opportunity to implement ISD measures. The hazards associated with each of these process modules may not always be well recognized. As a result, the pre‐FEED (front‐end engineering design) phase may miss the greatest opportunity to introduce corresponding ISD measures that will greatly reduce the required engineering barriers in the later project phases. The aim of this paper is to illustrate a risk‐based approach to this process, starting with hazard identification, followed by ISD goal identification and implementation. This paper will also highlight key lessons learned, including important ISD measures that may be missed by typical engineering contractors, and the key focus areas that process safety engineers should address in pre‐FEED to mitigate process safety risks in a typical integrated blue ammonia production facility.

Process Safety Progress
BP (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<scp>ISD</scp> (inherently safer design) considerations for blue ammonia projects — Chee Seang Ong · Process Safety Progress (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS