Contemporary Appraisal of Yuan Shikai’s Monarchical Movement: Focusing on ‘The Chronicle of the Monarchical Movement’,a Series of Articles in “Eastern Miscellany(東方雜誌)”

The main evaluation of Yuan Shikai in the last century was that he was a reactionary being to the development of modern China. In particular, the image of a Yuan as ‘Country stealer’ was formed for a long time due to the monarchical movement he promoted in the last stage of his life. In recent years, various re-evaluations have been attempted, which has freed Yuan Shikai from the image of a reactionary person to some extent, but the monarchical movement is still a historical event that symbolizes the final failure of Yuan Shikai.<br/> In this paper, I analyzed the contents of the ‘The Chronicle of the Monarchical Movement(帝制運動始末記)’ serialized articles in the July-October 1916 issue of the ‘Eastern Miscellany(東方雜誌)’, the largest magazine in Republic of China, published by the Commercial Press. Specifically, the following contents were examined. First, I checked the activities of major organizations that promoted the movement which began to appear in August 1915. Subsequently, the process until Yuan Shikai approved the monarchical system was tracked in detail. In addition, I looked at the progress of the National Protection War that took place from January 1916, and the process leading to the cancellation of the monarchial movement.<br/> Du Yaquan, the author of ‘The Chronicle of the Monarchical Movement’, had a critical view of the Yuan Shikai regime. However, he described the incident, excluding criticism of Yuan Shikai’s personal elements. He prioritized organizing the progress of the case accurately and demanded that readers judge themselves what the problem was. Du yaquan pointed out the injustices and inadequacies that appear in the way the contemporary regime operated constitutional politics by explaining the progress of the Monarchical Movement in detail.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17856/jahs.2025.12.173.341
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary Appraisal of Yuan Shikai’s Monarchical Movement: Focusing on ‘The Chronicle of the Monarchical Movement’,a Series of Articles in “Eastern Miscellany(東方雜誌)”

Han-gyul Lee
JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES
Japanese History and Culture
article

Contemporary Appraisal of Yuan Shikai’s Monarchical Movement: Focusing on ‘The Chronicle of the Monarchical Movement’,a Series of Articles in “Eastern Miscellany(東方雜誌)”

Han-gyul Lee
article en

Abstract

The main evaluation of Yuan Shikai in the last century was that he was a reactionary being to the development of modern China. In particular, the image of a Yuan as ‘Country stealer’ was formed for a long time due to the monarchical movement he promoted in the last stage of his life. In recent years, various re-evaluations have been attempted, which has freed Yuan Shikai from the image of a reactionary person to some extent, but the monarchical movement is still a historical event that symbolizes the final failure of Yuan Shikai.<br/> In this paper, I analyzed the contents of the ‘The Chronicle of the Monarchical Movement(帝制運動始末記)’ serialized articles in the July-October 1916 issue of the ‘Eastern Miscellany(東方雜誌)’, the largest magazine in Republic of China, published by the Commercial Press. Specifically, the following contents were examined. First, I checked the activities of major organizations that promoted the movement which began to appear in August 1915. Subsequently, the process until Yuan Shikai approved the monarchical system was tracked in detail. In addition, I looked at the progress of the National Protection War that took place from January 1916, and the process leading to the cancellation of the monarchial movement.<br/> Du Yaquan, the author of ‘The Chronicle of the Monarchical Movement’, had a critical view of the Yuan Shikai regime. However, he described the incident, excluding criticism of Yuan Shikai’s personal elements. He prioritized organizing the progress of the case accurately and demanded that readers judge themselves what the problem was. Du yaquan pointed out the injustices and inadequacies that appear in the way the contemporary regime operated constitutional politics by explaining the progress of the Monarchical Movement in detail.

JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIESVol. 173
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.