Putting Self-Peripheralization in the Global Knowledge Order

Abstract This article examines scholarly self-peripheralization as a side effect of catch-up strategies for academic advancement within the global knowledge order. Self-peripheralization is conceptualized as a two-fold process driven not only by those striving for inclusion in global academic exchange (status seekers), but also by those who set and enforce the norms of academic status and knowledge “excellence” (status givers). The relationship between global hegemony and injustice has not been sufficiently explored in the context where national academic institutions and individuals adhere to the rules established by epistemic hegemons while continuing to be treated as part of the “periphery.” This article also discusses strategies adopted by scholars outside the core in response to the challenges of academic development. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need to explore alternatives, advocating for a less judgmental and more inward-critical model that integrates diverse cognitive paradigms and approaches into modern scholarship within a broader political and cultural context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Global Studies
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2025-0017
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting Self-Peripheralization in the Global Knowledge Order

Mirek Dymitrow, Valentin Mihaylov
New Global Studies
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Putting Self-Peripheralization in the Global Knowledge Order

Mirek Dymitrow, Valentin Mihaylov
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines scholarly self-peripheralization as a side effect of catch-up strategies for academic advancement within the global knowledge order. Self-peripheralization is conceptualized as a two-fold process driven not only by those striving for inclusion in global academic exchange (status seekers), but also by those who set and enforce the norms of academic status and knowledge “excellence” (status givers). The relationship between global hegemony and injustice has not been sufficiently explored in the context where national academic institutions and individuals adhere to the rules established by epistemic hegemons while continuing to be treated as part of the “periphery.” This article also discusses strategies adopted by scholars outside the core in response to the challenges of academic development. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need to explore alternatives, advocating for a less judgmental and more inward-critical model that integrates diverse cognitive paradigms and approaches into modern scholarship within a broader political and cultural context.

New Global Studies
University of Economics in Katowice (PL), Linnaeus University (SE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Putting Self-Peripheralization in the Global Knowledge Order — Mirek Dymitrow, Valentin Mihaylov · New Global Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS