Machine learning in forensic toxicology: Concepts, applications and challenges in bioanalysis, ADME, and toxicodynamics.

Forensic toxicology focuses on the detection, quantification, and interpretation of medicinal and recreational drugs, other chemicals or poisons, and their metabolites in biological matrices. Chromatography, combined with mass spectrometry (MS), is the most widely used analytical technique. However, forensic toxicology faces increasing analytical challenges due to a continuously changing drug landscape. In particular, the emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has driven the development of more complex analytical methods (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry), novel markers (e.g., metabolomics), or innovative screening approaches (e.g., activity-based), which collectively generate vast amounts of data. These challenges include rapid market dynamics with the constant emergence of new chemical scaffolds and modifications, complex fragmentation and metabolic behavior, and limited or delayed access to reference materials- These developments are not limited to NPS alone. Consequently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have increasingly found their way into forensic toxicology. This review discusses various applications of ML methods related to bioanalysis, metabolomics, and toxicodynamics in the context of forensic toxicology. Currently, a major limitation is the compilation of sufficiently large and suitable datasets, which is often constrained by limited availability of real case data, inhomogeneous analytical data, in vivo study designs with small group size (< 10 animals per group), or a low number of included substances. Ultimately, the quality of an ML model relies not only on data quality but also on a thorough understanding of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology, medical case history, and ML design, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in these studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/94724
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning in forensic toxicology: Concepts, applications and challenges in bioanalysis, ADME, and toxicodynamics.

Wolfgang Weinmann, Felix Hammann, Daniel Pasin, Katharina Elisabeth Grafinger et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
article

Machine learning in forensic toxicology: Concepts, applications and challenges in bioanalysis, ADME, and toxicodynamics.

Wolfgang Weinmann, Felix Hammann, Daniel Pasin, Katharina Elisabeth Grafinger, Henrik D. Green, Christophe Pol Stove, Verena Schöning
article en

Abstract

Forensic toxicology focuses on the detection, quantification, and interpretation of medicinal and recreational drugs, other chemicals or poisons, and their metabolites in biological matrices. Chromatography, combined with mass spectrometry (MS), is the most widely used analytical technique. However, forensic toxicology faces increasing analytical challenges due to a continuously changing drug landscape. In particular, the emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has driven the development of more complex analytical methods (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry), novel markers (e.g., metabolomics), or innovative screening approaches (e.g., activity-based), which collectively generate vast amounts of data. These challenges include rapid market dynamics with the constant emergence of new chemical scaffolds and modifications, complex fragmentation and metabolic behavior, and limited or delayed access to reference materials- These developments are not limited to NPS alone. Consequently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have increasingly found their way into forensic toxicology. This review discusses various applications of ML methods related to bioanalysis, metabolomics, and toxicodynamics in the context of forensic toxicology. Currently, a major limitation is the compilation of sufficiently large and suitable datasets, which is often constrained by limited availability of real case data, inhomogeneous analytical data, in vivo study designs with small group size (< 10 animals per group), or a low number of included substances. Ultimately, the quality of an ML model relies not only on data quality but also on a thorough understanding of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology, medical case history, and ML design, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in these studies.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN), Institute of Forensic Sciences (US), Institute of Forensic Science (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.