To Love Without Memory: Seeds of a Christian Atheism in Deleuze and Kierkegaard

In this article I expand upon Deleuze’s injunction to ‘become capable of loving without memory’, reading the thought of Søren Kierkegaard and Gilles Deleuze as laying the foundations for a view that I call ‘Christian Atheism’. This is founded upon four basic principles: (1) God is love; (2) God-Love is neither a person nor a substance; (3) God-Love is the immanent, not transcendent, cause of all things; (4) God-Love is not a moral judge, but implies an ethical comportment, calling us forth in the love of self and in the love of the other or the love of the neighbour. I look first to Kierkegaard’s understanding of God as love, drawing comparisons with Deleuze’s notion of Being as affirmation. I then expand upon Kierkegaard’s God-Love through the sacrificial structural relation between renunciation and return as discussed in Fear and Trembling, before using this to expand upon Deleuze’s understanding of love without memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deleuze and Guattari Studies
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2026.0626
Primary Topic
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Love Without Memory: Seeds of a Christian Atheism in Deleuze and Kierkegaard

Vernon W. Cisney
Deleuze and Guattari Studies
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
article

To Love Without Memory: Seeds of a Christian Atheism in Deleuze and Kierkegaard

Vernon W. Cisney
article en

Abstract

In this article I expand upon Deleuze’s injunction to ‘become capable of loving without memory’, reading the thought of Søren Kierkegaard and Gilles Deleuze as laying the foundations for a view that I call ‘Christian Atheism’. This is founded upon four basic principles: (1) God is love; (2) God-Love is neither a person nor a substance; (3) God-Love is the immanent, not transcendent, cause of all things; (4) God-Love is not a moral judge, but implies an ethical comportment, calling us forth in the love of self and in the love of the other or the love of the neighbour. I look first to Kierkegaard’s understanding of God as love, drawing comparisons with Deleuze’s notion of Being as affirmation. I then expand upon Kierkegaard’s God-Love through the sacrificial structural relation between renunciation and return as discussed in Fear and Trembling, before using this to expand upon Deleuze’s understanding of love without memory.

Deleuze and Guattari StudiesVol. 20(1)
Gettysburg College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To Love Without Memory: Seeds of a Christian Atheism in Deleuze and Kierkegaard — Vernon W. Cisney · Deleuze and Guattari Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS