Drawing as research: drawing emplaced animals

There is contemporary interest in drawing practice as a research method in geography. This paper gathers aligned insights from visual studies and geography to deconstruct humanistic processes involved in researcher seeing and representation. Seeing is critiqued as a socio-cultural practice that can affirm intersectional injustices and suffering. I argue that to resist humanist interpretations of the more-than-human world, it is necessary to both de-territorialise the researcher self, and the research practice. I demonstrate that drawing performed as a becoming practice, offers one way to move towards a de-territorialisation approach and to conduct field research with a posthuman sensibility. The research is an example of a feminist research assemblage involving processual toggling between theory, practice and reflexive analysis. The discussion illuminates the problems of researching emplaced animals elucidated through two case studies that describe drawing a zoo tiger and a city farm cow. The drawing vignettes are introduced as experiments in the capacity for geographical research to attend to subjects through loosening the humanistic regimes of seeing and representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cultural Geographies
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740261418697
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drawing as research: drawing emplaced animals

Harriet Smith
Cultural Geographies
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Drawing as research: drawing emplaced animals

Harriet Smith
article en

Abstract

There is contemporary interest in drawing practice as a research method in geography. This paper gathers aligned insights from visual studies and geography to deconstruct humanistic processes involved in researcher seeing and representation. Seeing is critiqued as a socio-cultural practice that can affirm intersectional injustices and suffering. I argue that to resist humanist interpretations of the more-than-human world, it is necessary to both de-territorialise the researcher self, and the research practice. I demonstrate that drawing performed as a becoming practice, offers one way to move towards a de-territorialisation approach and to conduct field research with a posthuman sensibility. The research is an example of a feminist research assemblage involving processual toggling between theory, practice and reflexive analysis. The discussion illuminates the problems of researching emplaced animals elucidated through two case studies that describe drawing a zoo tiger and a city farm cow. The drawing vignettes are introduced as experiments in the capacity for geographical research to attend to subjects through loosening the humanistic regimes of seeing and representation.

Cultural Geographies
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Drawing as research: drawing emplaced animals — Harriet Smith · Cultural Geographies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS