Coronary plaque burden as a determinant of cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting: The Western Denmark Heart Registry

Benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) may be determined by total plaque burden alongside number of stenoses. We aimed to determine whether coronary artery calcification (CAC), reflecting overall plaque burden, predicts CABG versus PCI benefits. Among 85,512 symptomatic patients undergoing computed tomography angiography, we conducted propensity-matched analyses. CABG-treated patients (n = 1,479) were 1:1:1 matched with PCI-treated patients and non-obstructive CAD patients. Cox proportional hazard models assessed risk for the primary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, stroke), stratified by CAC<300, CAC 300-1000, and CAC>1000. Over 5.3 years, 710 primary endpoints occurred. CABG patients had higher prevalence of three-vessel obstructive CAD compared to PCI-treated patients (30 %vs.18 %). Event rates rose with increasing CAC scores; CAC<300 indicated low risk, CAC>1000 indicated very-high risk. Patients with non-obstructive CAD had similar risk to PCI-revascularized patients across CAC groups. Compared to PCI, risk for the primary endpoint were lower at higher plaque burden in CABG-treated patients with hazard ratios of 1.12 (95 %CI 0.70-1.80), 0.82 (95 %CI 0.55-1.20), and 0.75 (95 %CI 0.58-0.94) for CAC<300, CAC 300-1000, and CAC>1000, respectively. The lower CABG-associated risk was driven by reduced myocardial infarction risk (HR 0.44 (95 %CI 0.26-0.73)). Among patients with high, but not low, coronary plaque burden, CABG yielded lower long-term risk than PCI, despite more multivessel obstructive CAD. This suggest that the benefit of CABG over PCI for patients with extensive CAD can, at least partly, be attributed to the bypassing of a larger plaque burden. Among patients with high, but not low, coronary plaque burden as assessed by coronary artery calcification, revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with lower long-term risk than percutaneous coronary intervention despite higher prevalence of multivessel obstructive disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101429
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coronary plaque burden as a determinant of cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting: The Western Denmark Heart Registry

Hans Erik Bøtker, Niels Peter Rønnow Sand, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Martin Busk et al.
American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Coronary plaque burden as a determinant of cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting: The Western Denmark Heart Registry

Hans Erik Bøtker, Niels Peter Rønnow Sand, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Martin Busk, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Lars Lyhne Knudsen, Michael Maeng, J M Jensen, Michael J. Blaha, Kristian Kragholm, Erik Grove, Mariann Tang, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Patrick Serruys, Martin Bødtker Mortensen
article en

Abstract

Benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) may be determined by total plaque burden alongside number of stenoses. We aimed to determine whether coronary artery calcification (CAC), reflecting overall plaque burden, predicts CABG versus PCI benefits. Among 85,512 symptomatic patients undergoing computed tomography angiography, we conducted propensity-matched analyses. CABG-treated patients (n = 1,479) were 1:1:1 matched with PCI-treated patients and non-obstructive CAD patients. Cox proportional hazard models assessed risk for the primary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, stroke), stratified by CAC<300, CAC 300-1000, and CAC>1000. Over 5.3 years, 710 primary endpoints occurred. CABG patients had higher prevalence of three-vessel obstructive CAD compared to PCI-treated patients (30 %vs.18 %). Event rates rose with increasing CAC scores; CAC<300 indicated low risk, CAC>1000 indicated very-high risk. Patients with non-obstructive CAD had similar risk to PCI-revascularized patients across CAC groups. Compared to PCI, risk for the primary endpoint were lower at higher plaque burden in CABG-treated patients with hazard ratios of 1.12 (95 %CI 0.70-1.80), 0.82 (95 %CI 0.55-1.20), and 0.75 (95 %CI 0.58-0.94) for CAC<300, CAC 300-1000, and CAC>1000, respectively. The lower CABG-associated risk was driven by reduced myocardial infarction risk (HR 0.44 (95 %CI 0.26-0.73)). Among patients with high, but not low, coronary plaque burden, CABG yielded lower long-term risk than PCI, despite more multivessel obstructive CAD. This suggest that the benefit of CABG over PCI for patients with extensive CAD can, at least partly, be attributed to the bypassing of a larger plaque burden. Among patients with high, but not low, coronary plaque burden as assessed by coronary artery calcification, revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with lower long-term risk than percutaneous coronary intervention despite higher prevalence of multivessel obstructive disease.

American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Johns Hopkins University (US), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), University Hospital Galway (IE), Hospital South West Jutland (DK), Lillebaelt Hospital (DK), Regional Hospital Randers (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.