Book banning in U.S. K-12 classrooms: Teacher perceptions on the impact of book censorship on students

This quantitative research study investigates U.S. K-12 teacher perceptions of book censorship using five ethical paradigms as a conceptual framework. This study surveys 276 educators throughout the United States from all geographic regions and academic disciplines. The findings indicate that (a) most K-12 educators believe the censorship of books jeopardizes students’ abilities to build and sustain strong, equitable communities at the local, national, and international level; (b) many K-12 educators believe the censorship of classroom books undermines their professional responsibilities as teachers; and (c) the majority of K-12 educators do not want school districts or politicians to censor classroom books; however, many educators are willing or compelled by law to accommodate parental requests for their own child especially in grades K-5. Results indicate that educators—regardless of geographic location and discipline—hold similar beliefs on book censorship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Futures in Education
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103251412468
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Book banning in U.S. K-12 classrooms: Teacher perceptions on the impact of book censorship on students

Amy Leshinsky, Rachel McCormack
Policy Futures in Education
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Book banning in U.S. K-12 classrooms: Teacher perceptions on the impact of book censorship on students

Amy Leshinsky, Rachel McCormack
article en

Abstract

This quantitative research study investigates U.S. K-12 teacher perceptions of book censorship using five ethical paradigms as a conceptual framework. This study surveys 276 educators throughout the United States from all geographic regions and academic disciplines. The findings indicate that (a) most K-12 educators believe the censorship of books jeopardizes students’ abilities to build and sustain strong, equitable communities at the local, national, and international level; (b) many K-12 educators believe the censorship of classroom books undermines their professional responsibilities as teachers; and (c) the majority of K-12 educators do not want school districts or politicians to censor classroom books; however, many educators are willing or compelled by law to accommodate parental requests for their own child especially in grades K-5. Results indicate that educators—regardless of geographic location and discipline—hold similar beliefs on book censorship.

Policy Futures in Education
Curry College (US), Roger Williams University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.