Authorship network bias in meta-analysis

1. Meta-analyses are a reliable method for a quantitative research synthesis. They are, however, prone to specific biases that can be introduced in the process. Such a bias could exist if primary literature produces similar results if coming from the same authors. Authorship network bias is the non-independence of effect sizes introduced by the overlap of authors of primary studies. If not accounted for, it can severely impact the quality of meta-analysis and the conclusions drawn from it.2. To account for such non-independence, multilevel models with author clusters as an additional hierarchy level were recently suggested. We propose a new method for the detection of non-independent effect sizes based on authorship networks and for their correction.3. An analysis of simulated data demonstrates the effectiveness of the here-suggested new method. We further applied our new method to nine exemplary meta-analyses.4. Our new method for detection and effective correction can be easily integrated in existing meta-analysis workflows, using the functionality already offered by R's metafor package.5. Our goal is to enhance the reliability of meta-analyses by highlighting potential authorship network bias and offering a method to address this often-overlooked bias.