Uncertainty Evaluation of CMM and Optical 3D Scanning in Centrifugal Rotor Inspection

Dimensional verification of turbomachinery rotors requires traceable accuracy on functional data and dense coverage of freeform blades. This study quantifies the expanded measurement uncertainty (U95) for a centrifugal rotor inspected with a bridge-type CMM (Nikon Altera 10.10.8) and a structured-light scanner (ATOS Compact Scan 5M Rev.1), using repeated measurements in accordance with ISO 10360 and ISO 15530-3. The CMM achieved U95 ≈ 4–6 µm on bores, whereas optical scanning yielded U95 ≈ 12–18 µm on freeform blade regions. Cross-system results exhibited systematic offsets, indicating that the two methods are not directly interchangeable in absolute terms. Nevertheless, they are complementary: CMM ensures datum traceability, while optical scanning enables rapid full-field blade assessment, supporting uncertainty-aware hybrid inspection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrology
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6010012
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Evaluation of CMM and Optical 3D Scanning in Centrifugal Rotor Inspection

Mihai Vlăduț, Ana-Maria Dumitrache, Ionuț-Alin Dumitrache, Andrei George Totu
Metrology
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
article

Uncertainty Evaluation of CMM and Optical 3D Scanning in Centrifugal Rotor Inspection

Mihai Vlăduț, Ana-Maria Dumitrache, Ionuț-Alin Dumitrache, Andrei George Totu
article en

Abstract

Dimensional verification of turbomachinery rotors requires traceable accuracy on functional data and dense coverage of freeform blades. This study quantifies the expanded measurement uncertainty (U95) for a centrifugal rotor inspected with a bridge-type CMM (Nikon Altera 10.10.8) and a structured-light scanner (ATOS Compact Scan 5M Rev.1), using repeated measurements in accordance with ISO 10360 and ISO 15530-3. The CMM achieved U95 ≈ 4–6 µm on bores, whereas optical scanning yielded U95 ≈ 12–18 µm on freeform blade regions. Cross-system results exhibited systematic offsets, indicating that the two methods are not directly interchangeable in absolute terms. Nevertheless, they are complementary: CMM ensures datum traceability, while optical scanning enables rapid full-field blade assessment, supporting uncertainty-aware hybrid inspection.

MetrologyVol. 6(1)
Romanian Research and Development Institute for Gas Turbines (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Ministerul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.