Factors Affecting the Implant Supracrestal Complex: A Consensus Paper from the Global Consensus Meeting Organized by the Osstem Implant Community

Aim: To develop clear, evidence-based, and standardized guidelines for the design, selection, and clinical use of implant abutments and prosthetic components in order to optimize the biological, mechanical, and esthetic performance of the implant supracrestal complex. Methods: A panel of 10 expert clinicians and researchers in prosthodontics participated in the Osstem Global Consensus Meeting. For the present consensus meeting, a scoping review was performed in advance and discussed among the participants. A comprehensive search of the literature was performed up to June 2025. Two reviewers (M.T. and F.G.) independently conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The evidence was synthesized and discussed by the panel of expert clinicians during the consensus meeting. After that, guidelines were developed using a 14-question questionnaire to formulate consensus-based clinical recommendations. The participants answered structured questions and discussed discrepancies to achieve a consensus. Results: The panel of expert clinicians reached a consensus on several prosthetic key points. Concave abutment profiles and emergence angles <30° promoted peri-implant tissue stability, while convex designs and wider angles increased risks of bone loss and peri-implantitis. Titanium remains the reference abutment material in posterior sites, while zirconia provides superior esthetics anteriorly, and hybrid abutments balance strength and esthetics. Conclusions: Prosthetic design and abutment material selection critically affect peri-implant tissue stability and esthetic outcomes. The evidence supports screw-retained designs, platform switching, and the “one abutment–one time” approach for predictable long-term success.