DiscourseDash: designing and evaluating a tool for analysing social media discourses to support decision-making

Social media discourses have become a significant source of information for decision-makers across various fields, including public health, policy, and brand management. Although analytical tools exist to support these practices, there is a limited understanding of how industry experts engage with and incorporate a discourse-level analysis perspective into their decision-making workflows. To address this gap, we developed DiscourseDash, a dashboard tool that integrates stance detection, sentiment analysis, harmfulness detection, and popularity analysis of evolving social media discourses. DiscourseDash provides a structured view of discourse-level dynamics to support users in interpreting not just what is happening, but why. DiscourseDash differentiates itself from existing tools that primarily visualise high-level statistics by emphasising transparency and collaborative decision-making. We conducted a two-phase study: (1) a mixed-method evaluation with general users to assess effectiveness in navigating social media discourses within a scenario-based decision-making compared to an unstructured method, and (2) in-depth interviews with industry experts to understand their workflows, gather perceptions of DiscourseDash, and explore alignment with real-world practices. Our findings underscore the value of qualitative understanding in social media analysis by demonstrating how discourse-level insights support interpretation and encourage strategic decision-making. In recognising the central role of human expertise, our work highlights the importance of collaborative design by facilitating human interpretation with the prototype. This article contributes practical insights through a conceptual and design-led approach to social media analysis for decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3632
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DiscourseDash: designing and evaluating a tool for analysing social media discourses to support decision-making

Jérémie Clos, Xin Yu Liew, Nazia Hameed, Joel E. Fischer
PeerJ Computer Science
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

DiscourseDash: designing and evaluating a tool for analysing social media discourses to support decision-making

Jérémie Clos, Xin Yu Liew, Nazia Hameed, Joel E. Fischer
article en

Abstract

Social media discourses have become a significant source of information for decision-makers across various fields, including public health, policy, and brand management. Although analytical tools exist to support these practices, there is a limited understanding of how industry experts engage with and incorporate a discourse-level analysis perspective into their decision-making workflows. To address this gap, we developed DiscourseDash, a dashboard tool that integrates stance detection, sentiment analysis, harmfulness detection, and popularity analysis of evolving social media discourses. DiscourseDash provides a structured view of discourse-level dynamics to support users in interpreting not just what is happening, but why. DiscourseDash differentiates itself from existing tools that primarily visualise high-level statistics by emphasising transparency and collaborative decision-making. We conducted a two-phase study: (1) a mixed-method evaluation with general users to assess effectiveness in navigating social media discourses within a scenario-based decision-making compared to an unstructured method, and (2) in-depth interviews with industry experts to understand their workflows, gather perceptions of DiscourseDash, and explore alignment with real-world practices. Our findings underscore the value of qualitative understanding in social media analysis by demonstrating how discourse-level insights support interpretation and encourage strategic decision-making. In recognising the central role of human expertise, our work highlights the importance of collaborative design by facilitating human interpretation with the prototype. This article contributes practical insights through a conceptual and design-led approach to social media analysis for decision-making.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 12
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.