The influence of language background on iconicity perception

This study examines how iconicity in Korean Sign Language (KSL) and American Sign Language (ASL) is perceived by deaf KSL signers and Korean hearing non-signers. Twenty participants (i.e., 10 deaf KSL signers and 10 Korean hearing non-signers) completed five rating tasks (i.e., usage, familiarity, KSL iconicity, ASL iconicity, cross-language form similarity) for 32 target signs in a laboratory-based experiment. Group differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U Tests. KSL signers assigned higher iconicity ratings to KSL than hearing non-signers, indicating that judgments draw on language-internal associative networks beyond surface form-meaning correspondences. By contrast, the groups did not differ in ASL iconicity, and they gave similarly low cross-linguistic similarity ratings to KSL-ASL pairs. These results replicate and extend the work of Occhino et al. (2017), supporting the view that iconicity is not an intrinsic property of signs but a subjective assessment shaped by language experience and cultural knowledge.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2025.12.115.419
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of language background on iconicity perception

Youngju Choi, Hyeonah Kang
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

The influence of language background on iconicity perception

Youngju Choi, Hyeonah Kang
article en

Abstract

This study examines how iconicity in Korean Sign Language (KSL) and American Sign Language (ASL) is perceived by deaf KSL signers and Korean hearing non-signers. Twenty participants (i.e., 10 deaf KSL signers and 10 Korean hearing non-signers) completed five rating tasks (i.e., usage, familiarity, KSL iconicity, ASL iconicity, cross-language form similarity) for 32 target signs in a laboratory-based experiment. Group differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U Tests. KSL signers assigned higher iconicity ratings to KSL than hearing non-signers, indicating that judgments draw on language-internal associative networks beyond surface form-meaning correspondences. By contrast, the groups did not differ in ASL iconicity, and they gave similarly low cross-linguistic similarity ratings to KSL-ASL pairs. These results replicate and extend the work of Occhino et al. (2017), supporting the view that iconicity is not an intrinsic property of signs but a subjective assessment shaped by language experience and cultural knowledge.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 115
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.