Best Practices for Performing Analytical and Functional Biosimilarity Assessment of Recombinant Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars

Biotherapeutic products have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of numerous complex to manage diseases, such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, and infectious diseases. When compared with small molecules (pharmaceuticals), this class of therapeutic agents has proven to be more effective and, in general, have fewer side effects. However, they are more expensive (typically 10-1000 times more) and this limits their global affordability and accessibility. This realization has driven the rise of biosimilars, which are products that have been deemed to be highly similar to a reference product that has been already approved in the regulatory jurisdiction under consideration. A key element in receiving approval for a biosimilar product is for the manufacturer to successfully demonstrate its biosimilarity, an exercise comprising extensive characterization using a gamut of orthogonal, high-resolution analytical and functional tools. Once biosimilarity has been demonstrated, the extent of clinical evaluation that the manufacturer has to perform is significantly curtailed. In this white paper, we discuss various challenges that a manufacturer faces when performing these biosimilarity exercises for monoclonal antibody (mAb) products. Particular attention has been paid to the impact of excipients on these assessments. Using multiple case studies, we elucidate the impact of the removal of these excipients on product stability as well as the impact of their presence on the outcome from any of the analytical and functional tools that are commonly used in these biosimilarity assessments. We also offer best practices for the manufacturers of biosimilars to overcome the challenges associated with the presence of excipients in mAb formulations. Finally, we discuss the number of batches, the development of acceptance criteria and the importance of orthogonal methods in the demonstration of biosimilarity using examples from regulatory filings and guidances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The AAPS Journal
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-026-01206-1
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best Practices for Performing Analytical and Functional Biosimilarity Assessment of Recombinant Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars

Deepika Sarin, Vadim J. Gurvich, Satish Kumar Singh, Raj Suryanarayanan et al.
The AAPS Journal
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Best Practices for Performing Analytical and Functional Biosimilarity Assessment of Recombinant Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars

Deepika Sarin, Vadim J. Gurvich, Satish Kumar Singh, Raj Suryanarayanan, Reza Nejadnik, Anurag S. Rathore
article en

Abstract

Biotherapeutic products have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of numerous complex to manage diseases, such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, and infectious diseases. When compared with small molecules (pharmaceuticals), this class of therapeutic agents has proven to be more effective and, in general, have fewer side effects. However, they are more expensive (typically 10-1000 times more) and this limits their global affordability and accessibility. This realization has driven the rise of biosimilars, which are products that have been deemed to be highly similar to a reference product that has been already approved in the regulatory jurisdiction under consideration. A key element in receiving approval for a biosimilar product is for the manufacturer to successfully demonstrate its biosimilarity, an exercise comprising extensive characterization using a gamut of orthogonal, high-resolution analytical and functional tools. Once biosimilarity has been demonstrated, the extent of clinical evaluation that the manufacturer has to perform is significantly curtailed. In this white paper, we discuss various challenges that a manufacturer faces when performing these biosimilarity exercises for monoclonal antibody (mAb) products. Particular attention has been paid to the impact of excipients on these assessments. Using multiple case studies, we elucidate the impact of the removal of these excipients on product stability as well as the impact of their presence on the outcome from any of the analytical and functional tools that are commonly used in these biosimilarity assessments. We also offer best practices for the manufacturers of biosimilars to overcome the challenges associated with the presence of excipients in mAb formulations. Finally, we discuss the number of batches, the development of acceptance criteria and the importance of orthogonal methods in the demonstration of biosimilarity using examples from regulatory filings and guidances.

The AAPS JournalVol. 28(2)
University of Iowa (US), University of Minnesota (US), National Institute for Pharmaceutical Technology & Education (US), Astraea Therapeutics (United States) (US), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.