Lawmaking in the accusative:Decentering collective self-legislation for the Anthropocene

The vocation to realize autonomy defines what might be called modernity’s insurrection against contingent and heteronomous existence, both societal and natural. Modern constitutionalism takes up this vocation and the family of concepts associated to it, compressing them into a single expression: collective self-legislation. Yet the Anthro-has turned the tables: nature is in a state of insurrection against the drive to se-cure human autonomy, reminding us, modern denizens, of our irreducibly contingent and heteronomous condition as natural beings. This paper argues that affirming a constitutive condition of interdependency between humans and other-than-humans requires decentering collective self-legislation in two distinct but related ways. The first undercuts anthropocentrism, thus centrism as such; the second challenges anthropocentrism, hence human exceptionalism.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tilburg University Research Portal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4477/118984
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lawmaking in the accusative:Decentering collective self-legislation for the Anthropocene

Tilburg University Research Portal
Environmental law and policy
article

Lawmaking in the accusative:Decentering collective self-legislation for the Anthropocene

article en

Abstract

The vocation to realize autonomy defines what might be called modernity’s insurrection against contingent and heteronomous existence, both societal and natural. Modern constitutionalism takes up this vocation and the family of concepts associated to it, compressing them into a single expression: collective self-legislation. Yet the Anthro-has turned the tables: nature is in a state of insurrection against the drive to se-cure human autonomy, reminding us, modern denizens, of our irreducibly contingent and heteronomous condition as natural beings. This paper argues that affirming a constitutive condition of interdependency between humans and other-than-humans requires decentering collective self-legislation in two distinct but related ways. The first undercuts anthropocentrism, thus centrism as such; the second challenges anthropocentrism, hence human exceptionalism.

Tilburg University Research Portal
Institute on Governance (CA), Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.