Investigation of the Mechanical Properties and Friction Coefficient of Cr/CrTiAl and Cr/(CrTiAl)N/CrTiAl PVD Coatings Deposited on 42CrMo4 QT Steel

Test specimens fabricated from 42CrMo4 steel were subjected to heat treatment comprising quenching followed by high-temperature tempering. This treatment is commonly referred to as hardening, and the result is a tempered sorbite microstructure that provides a balanced combination of strength and plasticity. In order to improve the hardness and wear resistance of the contact surfaces, two types of physical vapor deposition (PVD) coatings were deposited onto the specimens: the first was a two-component architecture Cr/CrTiAl and the second was a multilayer Cr/(CrTiAl)N/CrTiAl. In both configurations, an intermediate chromium adhesion layer was initially deposited to enhance interfacial bonding with the substrate. The adhesion strength of the deposited coatings to the steel substrates was evaluated using a standardized adhesion test. The adhesion quality was classified as HF1 (the highest adhesion class in the HF1–HF6 scale, defined in EN ISO 26443), indicating excellent interfacial bonding. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of both coatings were determined through nanoindentation. According to the measured hardness values of the two coatings, 27.3 GPa (Cr/CrTiAl) and 37.5 GPa (Cr/(CrTiAl)N/CrTiAl), they can be classified as hard coatings (hardness greater than 20 GPa). Despite the difference in hardness, the two coatings have comparable elastic modulus values: Eit = 353 GPa for the two-component architecture coating and Eit = 349 GPa for the three-component architecture coating. Tribological characterization was performed using the ball-on-disc method under dry sliding conditions over a total sliding distance of 59 m, whereby the friction coefficient (µ) was recorded. Additionally, the wear rate of the applied coatings was calculated from the measured wear volumes or profiles. The two coatings have comparable friction coefficient values (Cr/CrTiAl–μ = 0.362, Cr/(CrTiAl)N/CrTiAl–μ = 0.325), but the three-component architecture coating Cr/(CrTiAl)N/CrTiAl has a lower wear rate (k = 1.64 × 10−4) compared to the two-component architecture coating Cr/CrTiAl, which has a wear rate of k = 7.6 × 10−4. The investigated coatings have hardness, modulus of elasticity and friction coefficient values competitive with those of nitride coatings (two-component architecture and three-component architecture), and their wear rate also corresponds to generally accepted values.