Tough constructions: Operator movement, null resumption, and semantic typing

This paper offers a new analysis of English tough constructions that resolves the tension between their internal A-bar dependency and the robust absence of reconstruction effects. This study claims that the tough-subject construction involves the base-generation of the matrix subject, which saturates a property (<e,st>) derived by null operator movement in the embedded clause. The lower copy of the operator is analyzed as a null resumptive pronoun rather than as a variable trace. This assumption explains the lack of Condition C and Weak Crossover effects while preserving the operator dependency required to license parasitic gaps. Finally, this analysis derives the asymmetry in experiencer PP licensing from a fundamental difference in semantic typing. The analysis demonstrates that while the expletive variant selects a proposition (<s,t>) capable of supporting external modification, thetough-subject variant selects a property that structurally excludes experiencer PPs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2025.12.115.503
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tough constructions: Operator movement, null resumption, and semantic typing

Soo-Min Hong
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Tough constructions: Operator movement, null resumption, and semantic typing

Soo-Min Hong
article en

Abstract

This paper offers a new analysis of English tough constructions that resolves the tension between their internal A-bar dependency and the robust absence of reconstruction effects. This study claims that the tough-subject construction involves the base-generation of the matrix subject, which saturates a property (<e,st>) derived by null operator movement in the embedded clause. The lower copy of the operator is analyzed as a null resumptive pronoun rather than as a variable trace. This assumption explains the lack of Condition C and Weak Crossover effects while preserving the operator dependency required to license parasitic gaps. Finally, this analysis derives the asymmetry in experiencer PP licensing from a fundamental difference in semantic typing. The analysis demonstrates that while the expletive variant selects a proposition (<s,t>) capable of supporting external modification, thetough-subject variant selects a property that structurally excludes experiencer PPs.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 115
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.