Quality indicators for the practice of emergency medicine in Europe (EUSEM-QI-V1): results of a European-wide expanded Delphi consensus process

Despite the well-documented complexity of agreeing what constitutes quality in emergency medicine, this European-wide study establishes a novel process by which indicators of quality can be agreed and acted upon. The spectrum of the initial 20 indicators (European Society for Emergency Medicine Quality Indicators Version 1) is broad, reflecting the reality of emergency medicine practice. This study found that currently low rates of measurement exist despite ranking highly as an indication of quality. This establishes a baseline of current practice and defines clear priorities for further work to address the 'evidence gap' regarding quality in emergency medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mej.0000000000001313
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality indicators for the practice of emergency medicine in Europe (EUSEM-QI-V1): results of a European-wide expanded Delphi consensus process

Kelly Janssens, Christoph Dodt, John Heyworth, Eric de Kruif et al.
European Journal of Emergency Medicine
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Quality indicators for the practice of emergency medicine in Europe (EUSEM-QI-V1): results of a European-wide expanded Delphi consensus process

Kelly Janssens, Christoph Dodt, John Heyworth, Eric de Kruif, Luis Garcia-Castrillo Riesgo
article en

Abstract

Despite the well-documented complexity of agreeing what constitutes quality in emergency medicine, this European-wide study establishes a novel process by which indicators of quality can be agreed and acted upon. The spectrum of the initial 20 indicators (European Society for Emergency Medicine Quality Indicators Version 1) is broad, reflecting the reality of emergency medicine practice. This study found that currently low rates of measurement exist despite ranking highly as an indication of quality. This establishes a baseline of current practice and defines clear priorities for further work to address the 'evidence gap' regarding quality in emergency medicine.

European Journal of Emergency MedicineVol. 33(2)
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), München Klinik Bogenhausen (DE), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE), Flevoziekenhuis (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.