Revisiting the cognitive advantages of professional soccer players

Bonetti et al. (2025, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) find that professional soccer players in Brazil and Sweden exhibit detectable cognitive advantages compared to a sample of Brazilian control participants, and that machine learning models trained on cognitive and personality characteristics can distinguish the professional players from the control participants with 97% accuracy. Analyzing the study's replication data, we find that some of the study's statistical analyses are mischaracterized, and we document potential issues in the sampling of control participants. In light of the latter, we focus on quality differences between professional Swedish players previously analyzed by some of the study's authors. We find that the paper's machine learning models can only distinguish high-quality Swedish professional players from lower-quality players with just 53% average accuracy, near the no-information rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2515523123
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the cognitive advantages of professional soccer players

Niklas Jakobsson, J. D. Fitzgerald, Abel Brodeur
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Revisiting the cognitive advantages of professional soccer players

Niklas Jakobsson, J. D. Fitzgerald, Abel Brodeur
article en

Abstract

Bonetti et al. (2025, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) find that professional soccer players in Brazil and Sweden exhibit detectable cognitive advantages compared to a sample of Brazilian control participants, and that machine learning models trained on cognitive and personality characteristics can distinguish the professional players from the control participants with 97% accuracy. Analyzing the study's replication data, we find that some of the study's statistical analyses are mischaracterized, and we document potential issues in the sampling of control participants. In light of the latter, we focus on quality differences between professional Swedish players previously analyzed by some of the study's authors. We find that the paper's machine learning models can only distinguish high-quality Swedish professional players from lower-quality players with just 53% average accuracy, near the no-information rate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(8)
University of Ottawa (CA), Tinbergen Institute (NL), Karlstad University (SE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.