Beyond Dispersion: Density, Industry, and Political Fragmentation in the Geography of Regional Job Centers

ABSTRACT Most research on the spatial organization of employment focuses on individual metropolitan areas, limiting insight into cross‐regional and generalizable patterns. At the same time, recent studies often rely on broad indicators of employment dispersion—such as the share of urbanized land occupied by jobs—while methodological advances in identifying job centers have lagged. As a result, comparative analyses of regional employment geographies, particularly those focused on job center formation and dominance, remain scarce. Using block‐level employment data, we adapt a spatial clustering model to identify job centers across the 100 most populous regions of the United States at three relative density thresholds. We then document variation in employment centralization and concentration across regions and density strata, and test—via regression models—how these patterns relate to metropolitan age, industry composition, and political fragmentation, serving as proxies for car orientation, agglomeration dynamics, and inter‐municipal competition, respectively. Our findings show that professional services are strongly associated with dense employment clustering, health care tends to agglomerate at lower densities, and the regional prevalence of finance is linked to greater employment concentration and central business district (CBD) dominance. Additionally, denser regions tend to have fewer but more dominant job centers, and political fragmentation is associated with flatter job center hierarchies and weaker CBD primacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regional Science
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70058
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Dispersion: Density, Industry, and Political Fragmentation in the Geography of Regional Job Centers

Zakhary Mallett, Nicholas Wilsey
Journal of Regional Science
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Beyond Dispersion: Density, Industry, and Political Fragmentation in the Geography of Regional Job Centers

Zakhary Mallett, Nicholas Wilsey
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most research on the spatial organization of employment focuses on individual metropolitan areas, limiting insight into cross‐regional and generalizable patterns. At the same time, recent studies often rely on broad indicators of employment dispersion—such as the share of urbanized land occupied by jobs—while methodological advances in identifying job centers have lagged. As a result, comparative analyses of regional employment geographies, particularly those focused on job center formation and dominance, remain scarce. Using block‐level employment data, we adapt a spatial clustering model to identify job centers across the 100 most populous regions of the United States at three relative density thresholds. We then document variation in employment centralization and concentration across regions and density strata, and test—via regression models—how these patterns relate to metropolitan age, industry composition, and political fragmentation, serving as proxies for car orientation, agglomeration dynamics, and inter‐municipal competition, respectively. Our findings show that professional services are strongly associated with dense employment clustering, health care tends to agglomerate at lower densities, and the regional prevalence of finance is linked to greater employment concentration and central business district (CBD) dominance. Additionally, denser regions tend to have fewer but more dominant job centers, and political fragmentation is associated with flatter job center hierarchies and weaker CBD primacy.

Journal of Regional Science
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.