Revisiting Ki-67 Assessment in Canine Mast Cell Tumours: From Manual Hotspot to Automated Global Analysis

Canine mast cell tumours (MCTs) show highly variable behaviour, and Ki-67 is an established prognostic indicator. Conventional Ki-67 assessment is manual and restricted to small hotspot areas, limiting reliability. This study presents a semi-automated whole-tumour tissue section (global) Ki-67 analysis workflow, outlines its limitations, and examines correlations with hotspot counts and clinical outcome. A total of 309 canine MCTs were assessed using a deep-learning-assisted quantification with commercial software. Global Ki-67 metrics were correlated with hotspot Ki-67 counts and histomorphologic tumour grades, as supported by clinical follow-up data from 68 dogs. The defined analytic workflow enabled an overall feasible global Ki-67 assessment in canine MCTs. The region-of-interest (ROI) definition required frequent manual adjustments, whereas Ki-67 quantification was fully automated and rapid. Global Ki-67 metrics correlated with manual hotspot counts, with Ki-67-positive cell density on average twice as high in tumour hotspots compared with whole tumour sections, with differences ranging up to 38-fold. Exploratory survival analyses suggested promising predictive power, warranting validation in a robust survival study. With established digital pathology tools, global whole-tumour assessment of Ki-67 and other biomarkers is feasible. It should become the new standard for defining robust prognostic and predictive markers in canine mast cell and other tumours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Sciences
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13020198
Primary Topic
Veterinary Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Ki-67 Assessment in Canine Mast Cell Tumours: From Manual Hotspot to Automated Global Analysis

Rebeca Scalco, Sven Rottenberg, Simone de Brot, Heike Aupperle‐Lellbach et al.
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Oncology Research
article

Revisiting Ki-67 Assessment in Canine Mast Cell Tumours: From Manual Hotspot to Automated Global Analysis

Rebeca Scalco, Sven Rottenberg, Simone de Brot, Heike Aupperle‐Lellbach, Elena Wasmer, Kathrin Jäger
article en

Abstract

Canine mast cell tumours (MCTs) show highly variable behaviour, and Ki-67 is an established prognostic indicator. Conventional Ki-67 assessment is manual and restricted to small hotspot areas, limiting reliability. This study presents a semi-automated whole-tumour tissue section (global) Ki-67 analysis workflow, outlines its limitations, and examines correlations with hotspot counts and clinical outcome. A total of 309 canine MCTs were assessed using a deep-learning-assisted quantification with commercial software. Global Ki-67 metrics were correlated with hotspot Ki-67 counts and histomorphologic tumour grades, as supported by clinical follow-up data from 68 dogs. The defined analytic workflow enabled an overall feasible global Ki-67 assessment in canine MCTs. The region-of-interest (ROI) definition required frequent manual adjustments, whereas Ki-67 quantification was fully automated and rapid. Global Ki-67 metrics correlated with manual hotspot counts, with Ki-67-positive cell density on average twice as high in tumour hotspots compared with whole tumour sections, with differences ranging up to 38-fold. Exploratory survival analyses suggested promising predictive power, warranting validation in a robust survival study. With established digital pathology tools, global whole-tumour assessment of Ki-67 and other biomarkers is feasible. It should become the new standard for defining robust prognostic and predictive markers in canine mast cell and other tumours.

Veterinary SciencesVol. 13(2)
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Laboklin (Germany) (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Veterinary Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.