Psychological Safety in Surgical Training

Psychological safety is the belief that individuals may ask questions, express doubts, and admit mistakes without fear of humiliation. It has emerged as a fundamental determinant of learning in high-stakes clinical environments. Surgical education remains historically hierarchical, often privileging endurance over vulnerability and silence over inquiry. While operative exposure and technical skill acquisition remain central to training, emerging evidence demonstrates that hierarchical and punitive workplace cultures impair error disclosure, suppress speaking-up behaviours, reduce feedback uptake, and increase cognitive load during performance, thereby limiting skill consolidation and patient safety improvement. This paper adopts a narrative review and conceptual synthesis approach, drawing on contemporary surgical, organisational, and educational literature to examine the mechanisms, barriers, and practical applications of psychological safety within surgical training. This paper argues that psychological safety is not merely a cultural aspiration but also a critical determinant of effective surgical training. The author reviews historical and contemporary models of surgical teaching, examines barriers, including hierarchy and punitive error responses, and proposes practical strategies for cultivating safe learning environments. The surgeon of the future must be developed not only through procedural volume but through mentorship that supports curiosity, reflection, and compassion. A psychologically safe surgical culture produces faster learners, safer decision-makers, and more ethically grounded clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.103862
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Safety in Surgical Training

Xiang Yuen Po
Cureus
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Psychological Safety in Surgical Training

Xiang Yuen Po
article en

Abstract

Psychological safety is the belief that individuals may ask questions, express doubts, and admit mistakes without fear of humiliation. It has emerged as a fundamental determinant of learning in high-stakes clinical environments. Surgical education remains historically hierarchical, often privileging endurance over vulnerability and silence over inquiry. While operative exposure and technical skill acquisition remain central to training, emerging evidence demonstrates that hierarchical and punitive workplace cultures impair error disclosure, suppress speaking-up behaviours, reduce feedback uptake, and increase cognitive load during performance, thereby limiting skill consolidation and patient safety improvement. This paper adopts a narrative review and conceptual synthesis approach, drawing on contemporary surgical, organisational, and educational literature to examine the mechanisms, barriers, and practical applications of psychological safety within surgical training. This paper argues that psychological safety is not merely a cultural aspiration but also a critical determinant of effective surgical training. The author reviews historical and contemporary models of surgical teaching, examines barriers, including hierarchy and punitive error responses, and proposes practical strategies for cultivating safe learning environments. The surgeon of the future must be developed not only through procedural volume but through mentorship that supports curiosity, reflection, and compassion. A psychologically safe surgical culture produces faster learners, safer decision-makers, and more ethically grounded clinicians.

CureusVol. 18(2)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.