Peritoneal Dialysis In Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: Time To Revisit?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently complicates admission to the intensive care unit.Dialysis required for AKI has a high mortality rate.The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the management of AKI has declined due to the rapid adoption of extracorporeal continuous renal replacement therapy.This is despite the fact that PD for AKI has potential advantages such as technical simplicity, low cost, and greater hemodynamic stability as compared to hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).There is now evidence to support the use of PD in critically ill patients.In AKI, there was no significant difference between PD and extracorporeal therapy in terms of mortality, recovery of renal function, or infectious complications.Improved techniques for establishing PD access, as well as the availability of automated cyclers and dialysate solutions, have increased efficacy and decreased the number of PD complications.Capacity building of healthcare personnel can increase familiarity and comfort with PD.This modality can be a reasonable and sometimes better option for critically ill patients in both resource-limited and resource-replete situations.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/ujms-11060-03_02_03
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peritoneal Dialysis In Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: Time To Revisit?

Afzal Parvez Khan, Alpana Raizada
Acute Kidney Injury Research
article

Peritoneal Dialysis In Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: Time To Revisit?

Afzal Parvez Khan, Alpana Raizada
article en

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently complicates admission to the intensive care unit.Dialysis required for AKI has a high mortality rate.The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the management of AKI has declined due to the rapid adoption of extracorporeal continuous renal replacement therapy.This is despite the fact that PD for AKI has potential advantages such as technical simplicity, low cost, and greater hemodynamic stability as compared to hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).There is now evidence to support the use of PD in critically ill patients.In AKI, there was no significant difference between PD and extracorporeal therapy in terms of mortality, recovery of renal function, or infectious complications.Improved techniques for establishing PD access, as well as the availability of automated cyclers and dialysate solutions, have increased efficacy and decreased the number of PD complications.Capacity building of healthcare personnel can increase familiarity and comfort with PD.This modality can be a reasonable and sometimes better option for critically ill patients in both resource-limited and resource-replete situations.

Vol. 3(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.