Modelling of atmospheric copper, iron, and manganese over Europe

Although the adverse health effects of particulate matter (PM) are often considered in terms of mass and particle size, a growing number of studies now focus on new health metrics such as the oxidative potential (OP) of PM, highlighting the role of certain metals, among them copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and manganese (Mn) for their capacity to impact OP levels in ambient air. In this study, we built on a previously-developed European anthropogenic emission inventory for Cu, Fe and Mn to simulate PM<inf>10</inf> concentrations of these metals within PM<inf>10</inf> during a two-year period with the WRF-CHIMERE chemistry transport model, applying a source-tagging method. We also estimated the contribution of erosion dust (mostly of African origin) and urban dust (mostly road and construction dust) as significant sources for each of these metals. For validation purpose, we compared the simulation results with a large database of measurements collected from various sources and locations. The medians of the fractional mean biases for Cu are close to zero for both rural and urban background sites, indicating that the emission in the inventory adequately represent atmospheric Cu concentrations. However, the biases are highly negative for Fe and Mn in a simulation when only considering anthropogenic emissions. The correlation coefficients obtained for (rural and urban) background stations range from 0.4 to 0.6, with urban sites showing slightly higher correlations for Fe but slightly lower ones for Cu and Mn. The inclusion of desert dust sources improves the correlation for some rural stations, while including local urban dust has a less pronounced effect. However, neither source fully explains the significant biases for Fe and Mn concentrations. Overall, this study calls for further works to try and elucidate the missing sources of Fe and Mn, revisit our previously developed emission inventory, and refine the share of PM resuspension to ambient air concentrations of key metallic compounds.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric Environment
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2026.121884
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling of atmospheric copper, iron, and manganese over Europe

L.Y. Alleman, M. Vida, A. Alastuey, E. Stratigou et al.
Atmospheric Environment
Heavy metals in environment
article

Modelling of atmospheric copper, iron, and manganese over Europe

L.Y. Alleman, M. Vida, A. Alastuey, E. Stratigou, G. Foret, F. Amato, J.-M. André, Robin Aujay-Plouzeau, O. Favez, G. Uzu, M. Beekmann, G. Siour, A. Ito, N. Dubois, S. Moukhtar, S. Conil, X. Querol, G. Salque-Moreton, F. Couvidat, C. Pallares, J.-L. Jaffrezo, N. Sirina-Leboine
article en

Abstract

Although the adverse health effects of particulate matter (PM) are often considered in terms of mass and particle size, a growing number of studies now focus on new health metrics such as the oxidative potential (OP) of PM, highlighting the role of certain metals, among them copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and manganese (Mn) for their capacity to impact OP levels in ambient air. In this study, we built on a previously-developed European anthropogenic emission inventory for Cu, Fe and Mn to simulate PM<inf>10</inf> concentrations of these metals within PM<inf>10</inf> during a two-year period with the WRF-CHIMERE chemistry transport model, applying a source-tagging method. We also estimated the contribution of erosion dust (mostly of African origin) and urban dust (mostly road and construction dust) as significant sources for each of these metals. For validation purpose, we compared the simulation results with a large database of measurements collected from various sources and locations. The medians of the fractional mean biases for Cu are close to zero for both rural and urban background sites, indicating that the emission in the inventory adequately represent atmospheric Cu concentrations. However, the biases are highly negative for Fe and Mn in a simulation when only considering anthropogenic emissions. The correlation coefficients obtained for (rural and urban) background stations range from 0.4 to 0.6, with urban sites showing slightly higher correlations for Fe but slightly lower ones for Cu and Mn. The inclusion of desert dust sources improves the correlation for some rural stations, while including local urban dust has a less pronounced effect. However, neither source fully explains the significant biases for Fe and Mn concentrations. Overall, this study calls for further works to try and elucidate the missing sources of Fe and Mn, revisit our previously developed emission inventory, and refine the share of PM resuspension to ambient air concentrations of key metallic compounds.

Atmospheric EnvironmentVol. 372
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Heavy metals in environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.