Identifying Population Groups Based on Humanity Attribution to Low‐, Middle‐ and High‐Socioeconomic Status Groups: A Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis

ABSTRACT Despite growing research on (de)humanisation in the socioeconomic domain, the extent and diversity of these tendencies within the population remain unclear. This study used a representative sample of Spaniards ( N = 1478) to examine the existence and prevalence of distinct dehumaniser profiles at both the individual (Level 1) and societal (Level 2) levels. We conducted a multilevel latent profile analysis using humanity attribution scores for low‐, middle‐ and high‐SES groups. At the individual level, five profiles emerged: high‐ (12%), middle‐ (27%) and low‐ (41%) generalised humanisers, high‐SES dehumanisers (6%) and hierarchy legitimisers (13%). At the societal level, we identified three profiles: assimilators (52%), indifferents (7%) and unsettled (41%). Adherence to these profiles appeared to be influenced by participants' socioeconomic backgrounds or system justification and meritocracy, with profiles differing in their demand for social change. We discuss the applied relevance of mapping dehumanisation tendencies on the design of targeted interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70240
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Population Groups Based on Humanity Attribution to Low‐, Middle‐ and High‐Socioeconomic Status Groups: A Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis

Rocío Linares, Mario Sainz, Roberto M. Lobato
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Identifying Population Groups Based on Humanity Attribution to Low‐, Middle‐ and High‐Socioeconomic Status Groups: A Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis

Rocío Linares, Mario Sainz, Roberto M. Lobato
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite growing research on (de)humanisation in the socioeconomic domain, the extent and diversity of these tendencies within the population remain unclear. This study used a representative sample of Spaniards ( N = 1478) to examine the existence and prevalence of distinct dehumaniser profiles at both the individual (Level 1) and societal (Level 2) levels. We conducted a multilevel latent profile analysis using humanity attribution scores for low‐, middle‐ and high‐SES groups. At the individual level, five profiles emerged: high‐ (12%), middle‐ (27%) and low‐ (41%) generalised humanisers, high‐SES dehumanisers (6%) and hierarchy legitimisers (13%). At the societal level, we identified three profiles: assimilators (52%), indifferents (7%) and unsettled (41%). Adherence to these profiles appeared to be influenced by participants' socioeconomic backgrounds or system justification and meritocracy, with profiles differing in their demand for social change. We discuss the applied relevance of mapping dehumanisation tendencies on the design of targeted interventions.

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 36(2)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad de Burgos (ES)
European Commission, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.