From Expert-Based Evaluation to Data-Driven Modeling: Performance-Based Flood Susceptibility Mapping

Floods are natural disasters that cause significant socioeconomic and environmental losses in both urban and rural areas. Within the framework of spatial planning, precautionary measures against flood hazards can be developed using analytical approaches based on different modeling techniques. In this study, flood-prone areas in the Melen Basin, Türkiye, were identified and mapped using five statistical methods, namely Frequency Ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), Evidential Belief Function (EBF), and the hybrid models EBF–SE and EBF–FR. The analysis was conducted using a flood inventory and environmental datasets covering the period 2019–2024, including elevation, slope, aspect, land use, plan and profile curvature, drainage density, distance to river, curve number, long-term average precipitation, geological formation, soil depth, topographic wetness index, sediment transport, and stream power index. Model performances were evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Area Under the Curve (AUC). The results indicate that the SE method achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.979), followed by FR (0.974), EBF–SE (0.972), EBF–FR (0.968), and EBF (0.966). According to the FR and SE models, elevation, lithology, and slope were identified as the most influential factors in flood occurrence. In the evaluation of the success index of the models, the following values were determined according to their size: EBF–SE (96.0), SE (94.4), EBF (91.8), FR (81.9), and EBF–FR (79.4). In the classification of flood sensitivity maps, Natural Breaks (Jenks) is the most successful method according to the success index. The findings demonstrate that data-driven and hybrid models can effectively support flood risk assessment and provide valuable input for land-use planning and flood risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnological Review
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev26010006
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Expert-Based Evaluation to Data-Driven Modeling: Performance-Based Flood Susceptibility Mapping

Tülay Erbesler Ayaşlıgil, Mustafa Tanrıverdi
Limnological Review
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

From Expert-Based Evaluation to Data-Driven Modeling: Performance-Based Flood Susceptibility Mapping

Tülay Erbesler Ayaşlıgil, Mustafa Tanrıverdi
article en

Abstract

Floods are natural disasters that cause significant socioeconomic and environmental losses in both urban and rural areas. Within the framework of spatial planning, precautionary measures against flood hazards can be developed using analytical approaches based on different modeling techniques. In this study, flood-prone areas in the Melen Basin, Türkiye, were identified and mapped using five statistical methods, namely Frequency Ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), Evidential Belief Function (EBF), and the hybrid models EBF–SE and EBF–FR. The analysis was conducted using a flood inventory and environmental datasets covering the period 2019–2024, including elevation, slope, aspect, land use, plan and profile curvature, drainage density, distance to river, curve number, long-term average precipitation, geological formation, soil depth, topographic wetness index, sediment transport, and stream power index. Model performances were evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Area Under the Curve (AUC). The results indicate that the SE method achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.979), followed by FR (0.974), EBF–SE (0.972), EBF–FR (0.968), and EBF (0.966). According to the FR and SE models, elevation, lithology, and slope were identified as the most influential factors in flood occurrence. In the evaluation of the success index of the models, the following values were determined according to their size: EBF–SE (96.0), SE (94.4), EBF (91.8), FR (81.9), and EBF–FR (79.4). In the classification of flood sensitivity maps, Natural Breaks (Jenks) is the most successful method according to the success index. The findings demonstrate that data-driven and hybrid models can effectively support flood risk assessment and provide valuable input for land-use planning and flood risk management.

Limnological ReviewVol. 26(1)
Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.