Human olfactory sensitivity varies across geographical locations

It has been assumed that olfactory sensitivity is relatively consistent in different populations worldwide. Emerging, yet fragmented evidence lends credit to the hypothesis that olfactory sensitivity may be geographically diverse. To gain deeper insight regarding the interplay between geographical, demographic, and health factors in the context of olfactory sensitivity, we conducted a multicenter study comprising data from 1046 participants inhabiting 19 locations around the world. Our results revealed that location accounted for 17–20% of the variance in chemosensory sensitivity. Demographic and psychological factors related to working memory and depressive symptoms also contribute to explaining sensitivity to odors, accounting for 1.6–2.9% of the variance in chemosensory sensitivity. Thus, we conclude that inhabitants of different geographical regions may present different sensitivities to chemical stimuli. We discuss the factors that could potentially be included in future investigations to pinpoint even more precisely what factors determine differences in chemosensory sensitivity around the globe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38727-w
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human olfactory sensitivity varies across geographical locations

Barbara Żyżelewicz, Katarzyna Resler, R. Kamel, Nixon M. Abraham et al.
Scientific Reports
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
article

Human olfactory sensitivity varies across geographical locations

Barbara Żyżelewicz, Katarzyna Resler, R. Kamel, Nixon M. Abraham, Jancy Nixon Abraham, Çağdaş Güdücü, Farhad Rafiei, Carla Masala, Marjan Mirsalehi, Brianna J. Turner, Ayaho Yoshino, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Maria L. Albanese, Mehmet K. Mahmut, I. Miri, Marco Aurélio Fornazieri, Marlise K. Hofer, Lixin Chen, Shahid Husain, Sharanya Thodupunoori, Elliott Lamond, Fatima Gansatao, Hangying Wu, Aleksandra Reichert, Johannes Frasnelli, Daniel Marek, Élizabeth Michaluk, Plamena Miteva, Keigo Nakaachi, Hozifa Alsaid Sheta, Nora Van Oosterhout, Juan Martin Fuselli, Hanène Naija, Laiquan Zou, Rafieh Alizadeh, Francesco Loy, Ahmed Radwan, Ines Aloulou, Henrique O. Scussiatto, Patricia Portillo Mazal, Thomas Hummel, Ma. Lourdes Berioso Enecilla, Isabel Bernardes Moura, Jayant M. Pinto, Devesh Rawat, Anasuha Musa, Anna Kristina Hernandez
article en

Abstract

It has been assumed that olfactory sensitivity is relatively consistent in different populations worldwide. Emerging, yet fragmented evidence lends credit to the hypothesis that olfactory sensitivity may be geographically diverse. To gain deeper insight regarding the interplay between geographical, demographic, and health factors in the context of olfactory sensitivity, we conducted a multicenter study comprising data from 1046 participants inhabiting 19 locations around the world. Our results revealed that location accounted for 17–20% of the variance in chemosensory sensitivity. Demographic and psychological factors related to working memory and depressive symptoms also contribute to explaining sensitivity to odors, accounting for 1.6–2.9% of the variance in chemosensory sensitivity. Thus, we conclude that inhabitants of different geographical regions may present different sensitivities to chemical stimuli. We discuss the factors that could potentially be included in future investigations to pinpoint even more precisely what factors determine differences in chemosensory sensitivity around the globe.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Cairo University (EG), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of Cagliari (IT), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IN), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), University of Victoria (CA), University of Wrocław (PL), Shiv Nadar University (IN), Philippine General Hospital (PH), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), University of Chicago (US), East Avenue Medical Center (PH), St. Luke's Medical Center (PH), Institute of Psychology (PL), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Cagliari (IT), Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences (PL), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Southern Medical University (CN), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA), Nippon Medical School (JP), Manouba University (TN), National University of Malaysia (MY), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.