Impact of state insurance mandates on in vitro fertilization utilization among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss
States with IVF mandates inclusive of RPL performed 53% more cycles for this indication than those with exclusive mandates or no mandate. Though RPL is not currently an accepted indication for IVF, future research may demonstrate utility of IVF for specific subgroups of patients with RPL, such as those with balanced translocations. Mandates should maintain inclusivity in defining who is eligible for fertility coverage so as not to exclude patients from accessing care as reproductive medicine advances.
Authors
- Trapti Jain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-5947)
- Benjamin J. Peipert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5038-7472)
- Meridith Pollie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0100-337X)
- Marissa S. Weiss
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
- Published
- 2026-02-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-025-01463-3
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00