Comparative assessment of United States coastal hubs for large scale electrochemical marine carbon dioxide removal

Removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is essential to meet climate targets and limit global warming. Oceans already absorb a large share of carbon dioxide, and electrochemical methods can strengthen this process by treating seawater to increase its storage capacity. Here, we identify locations along the United States coastline that can support large-scale deployment of such systems. Thirty-eight facilities with seawater intake, including power plants, desalination plants, and liquefied natural gas terminals, are grouped into five hubs: Northeast, Southeast, South, West, and Northwest. A decision-making framework evaluates each hub based on removal capacity, cost, energy mix, local emissions, community vulnerability, facility diversity, and supporting infrastructure. The South, West, and Northeast hubs rank highest for deployment because they combine strong removal potential, affordability, and infrastructure readiness. This framework provides a practical tool for selecting priority sites and guiding technology development and policy for ocean-based carbon dioxide removal. Assessment of 38 seawater-intake facilities along the continental United States coast reveals that large scale deployment of electrochemical marine-based carbon dioxide removal hubs is possible using a multicriteria decision-making framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Sustainability
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-026-00035-9
Primary Topic
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of United States coastal hubs for large scale electrochemical marine carbon dioxide removal

Abdelrahman Refaie, Mohsen Afshari, Gaurav Sant, Erika Callagon La Plante et al.
Communications Sustainability
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
article

Comparative assessment of United States coastal hubs for large scale electrochemical marine carbon dioxide removal

Abdelrahman Refaie, Mohsen Afshari, Gaurav Sant, Erika Callagon La Plante, Mim Rahimi, David Jassby, Vanessa Tapia
article en

Abstract

Removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is essential to meet climate targets and limit global warming. Oceans already absorb a large share of carbon dioxide, and electrochemical methods can strengthen this process by treating seawater to increase its storage capacity. Here, we identify locations along the United States coastline that can support large-scale deployment of such systems. Thirty-eight facilities with seawater intake, including power plants, desalination plants, and liquefied natural gas terminals, are grouped into five hubs: Northeast, Southeast, South, West, and Northwest. A decision-making framework evaluates each hub based on removal capacity, cost, energy mix, local emissions, community vulnerability, facility diversity, and supporting infrastructure. The South, West, and Northeast hubs rank highest for deployment because they combine strong removal potential, affordability, and infrastructure readiness. This framework provides a practical tool for selecting priority sites and guiding technology development and policy for ocean-based carbon dioxide removal. Assessment of 38 seawater-intake facilities along the continental United States coast reveals that large scale deployment of electrochemical marine-based carbon dioxide removal hubs is possible using a multicriteria decision-making framework.

Communications SustainabilityVol. 1(1)
California NanoSystems Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Houston (US), Columbia University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.