In‐Field Cage Infestation Patterns of Host Fish for the Freshwater Pearl Mussel ( <scp> <i>Margaritifera margaritifera</i> </scp> ) in a Fragmented River Before Restoration

ABSTRACT The freshwater pearl mussel ( Margaritifera margaritifera ) is among the most endangered unionids in Europe. Many populations are highly specialized and solely infest specific parapatric populations of either brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) or Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ). River fragmentation can prevent mussel populations from completing a generational turnover if their migratory hosts can no longer reach upriver mussel habitats. Here, we tested a seminatural reintroduction method and compared the mussel infestation rates on different salmonid ecotypes in an experimental field scenario where previously separated salmonid populations will be reconnected following river rehabilitation. In our study, upriver resident trout sympatric to the mussels and migratory trout and Atlantic salmon allopatric to the mussels (separated by several migration barriers) were cohabitated in in‐field cages containing M. margaritifera allowing for a seminatural infestation. We demonstrate that all three salmonid ecotypes hosted a significantly different number of larval mussels: the resident trout was the most heavily infested, while the allopatric salmon hosted the fewest. This study demonstrates that, insofar as only the mussels are moved between locations, in‐field cage infestation can be a successful method for mussel conservation as it requires significantly less investment than producing juvenile mussels in a dedicated facility. Further work should be conducted to evaluate the long‐term success rate of this reintroduction method and on how to optimize the husbandry of the fish in the cages to minimize mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.70346
Primary Topic
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In‐Field Cage Infestation Patterns of Host Fish for the Freshwater Pearl Mussel ( Margaritifera margaritifera ) in a Fragmented River Before Restoration

Johan Watz, Sebastian L. Rock, Martin Österling, Olle Calles et al.
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
article

In‐Field Cage Infestation Patterns of Host Fish for the Freshwater Pearl Mussel ( Margaritifera margaritifera ) in a Fragmented River Before Restoration

Johan Watz, Sebastian L. Rock, Martin Österling, Olle Calles, Anders Persson, Marie Andersson, P. Anders Nilsson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The freshwater pearl mussel ( Margaritifera margaritifera ) is among the most endangered unionids in Europe. Many populations are highly specialized and solely infest specific parapatric populations of either brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) or Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ). River fragmentation can prevent mussel populations from completing a generational turnover if their migratory hosts can no longer reach upriver mussel habitats. Here, we tested a seminatural reintroduction method and compared the mussel infestation rates on different salmonid ecotypes in an experimental field scenario where previously separated salmonid populations will be reconnected following river rehabilitation. In our study, upriver resident trout sympatric to the mussels and migratory trout and Atlantic salmon allopatric to the mussels (separated by several migration barriers) were cohabitated in in‐field cages containing M. margaritifera allowing for a seminatural infestation. We demonstrate that all three salmonid ecotypes hosted a significantly different number of larval mussels: the resident trout was the most heavily infested, while the allopatric salmon hosted the fewest. This study demonstrates that, insofar as only the mussels are moved between locations, in‐field cage infestation can be a successful method for mussel conservation as it requires significantly less investment than producing juvenile mussels in a dedicated facility. Further work should be conducted to evaluate the long‐term success rate of this reintroduction method and on how to optimize the husbandry of the fish in the cages to minimize mortality.

Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsVol. 36(2)
Lund University (SE), Karlstad University (SE)
Karlstads universitet, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Lunds Universitet
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.