IceCT: A MoE‐Based Model for Seasonal Arctic Sea Ice Concentration and Thickness Prediction

Abstract The rapid decline of Arctic sea ice requires accurate prediction of its concentration (SIC) and thickness (SIT). We introduce IceCT, a deep learning model using a Mixture‐of‐Experts (MoE) framework to generate monthly SIC and SIT forecasts at a 12.5 km resolution up to 6 months ahead. Its architecture features two specialized experts—one for SIC, one for SIT—enhanced with Multi‐Head Self‐Attention (MHSA) to capture spatial patterns. A novel Spatial Gate adaptively weights the experts' contributions across the grid. Evaluations show IceCT outperforms other deep learning baselines, achieving an overall Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 4.56% for SIC and 0.140 m for SIT, and achieves enhanced predictive skill in forecasting sea ice during the crucial summer melting period. Additionally, the model mitigates the Arctic spring predictability barrier by learning to rely more on SIT information for forecasts initialized in spring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jh001010
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IceCT: A MoE‐Based Model for Seasonal Arctic Sea Ice Concentration and Thickness Prediction

Z. Zhang, Yi Bao, Ning Chen, Yi Zhang
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

IceCT: A MoE‐Based Model for Seasonal Arctic Sea Ice Concentration and Thickness Prediction

Z. Zhang, Yi Bao, Ning Chen, Yi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rapid decline of Arctic sea ice requires accurate prediction of its concentration (SIC) and thickness (SIT). We introduce IceCT, a deep learning model using a Mixture‐of‐Experts (MoE) framework to generate monthly SIC and SIT forecasts at a 12.5 km resolution up to 6 months ahead. Its architecture features two specialized experts—one for SIC, one for SIT—enhanced with Multi‐Head Self‐Attention (MHSA) to capture spatial patterns. A novel Spatial Gate adaptively weights the experts' contributions across the grid. Evaluations show IceCT outperforms other deep learning baselines, achieving an overall Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 4.56% for SIC and 0.140 m for SIT, and achieves enhanced predictive skill in forecasting sea ice during the crucial summer melting period. Additionally, the model mitigates the Arctic spring predictability barrier by learning to rely more on SIT information for forecasts initialized in spring.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 3(1)
Peking University (CN), Suzhou Research Institute (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), Institute of Navigation (US), State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.