When the Future Feels Foreclosed: AI Resignation and the Power to Act

ABSTRACT This article develops the concept of ‘AI resignation’ to capture how young people encounter AI not only as a helpful or flawed tool, but as an overpowering and seemingly inevitable force that can foreclose their sense of political and personal power to act in relation to the future. Building on qualitative work with high school students in Germany (ages 15–18), we conceptualize AI resignation as a future‐oriented sensibility that emerges at the intersection of pervasive data‐driven infrastructures and hegemonic narratives of AI inevitability. Drawing on Foucault's late work on subjectivation and subjectivity, as well as extensions in media and affect theory, we identify four contradictory pulls that structure adolescents' everyday engagements with AI—between enthusiasm and dependency, effortless access and eroded learning, self‐governance and repeated failure, aspiration and foreclosed futures—and show how these double binds gradually hollow out experiences of self‐efficacy. We further argue that AI resignation fulfils a strategic affective function within digital capitalism: by naturalizing dependence on predictive AI infrastructures and normalizing diminished expectations of the power to act, it stabilizes the very sociotechnical structures that produce it. The article concludes by outlining implications for re‐politicizing AI and education, emphasizing power‐critical curricula and collective spaces of reflection that enable young people to meaningfully participate in shaping sociotechnical futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Humanities
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fhu2.70026
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the Future Feels Foreclosed: AI Resignation and the Power to Act

Annemarie Witschas, Rainer Mühlhoff, Jan‐Philipp Siebold
Future Humanities
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

When the Future Feels Foreclosed: AI Resignation and the Power to Act

Annemarie Witschas, Rainer Mühlhoff, Jan‐Philipp Siebold
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article develops the concept of ‘AI resignation’ to capture how young people encounter AI not only as a helpful or flawed tool, but as an overpowering and seemingly inevitable force that can foreclose their sense of political and personal power to act in relation to the future. Building on qualitative work with high school students in Germany (ages 15–18), we conceptualize AI resignation as a future‐oriented sensibility that emerges at the intersection of pervasive data‐driven infrastructures and hegemonic narratives of AI inevitability. Drawing on Foucault's late work on subjectivation and subjectivity, as well as extensions in media and affect theory, we identify four contradictory pulls that structure adolescents' everyday engagements with AI—between enthusiasm and dependency, effortless access and eroded learning, self‐governance and repeated failure, aspiration and foreclosed futures—and show how these double binds gradually hollow out experiences of self‐efficacy. We further argue that AI resignation fulfils a strategic affective function within digital capitalism: by naturalizing dependence on predictive AI infrastructures and normalizing diminished expectations of the power to act, it stabilizes the very sociotechnical structures that produce it. The article concludes by outlining implications for re‐politicizing AI and education, emphasizing power‐critical curricula and collective spaces of reflection that enable young people to meaningfully participate in shaping sociotechnical futures.

Future HumanitiesVol. 4(1)
Osnabrück University (DE), Hochschule Osnabrück (DE)
Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.